Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra vs. Blackview Oscal Pad 10: A Deep Dive into Rugged Tablet Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7400X chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power over the Oscal Pad 10’s Unisoc T606, making it ideal for demanding tasks. While the Oscal Pad 10 provides a more affordable entry point, it compromises significantly on speed and efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra | Blackview Oscal Pad 10 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October | 2022, December 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 11 | Available. Released Exp. release 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 269.7 x 179.5 x 27.8 mm (10.62 x 7.07 x 1.09 in) | 241.3 x 160 x 8.9 mm (9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 1600 g (3.53 lb) | 536 g (1.18 lb) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~72.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 13 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 8 MP, 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Unspecified |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 10W reverse wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 24200 mAh | Li-Ion 6580 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Mint Green, Moonlight Silver, Diamond Grey |
| Price | About 700 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 401:34h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class D (85 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra
- Blazing-fast 120W charging for minimal downtime.
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7400X chipset for smooth performance.
- Long battery lifespan with 1000 charge cycles.
- Likely higher price point compared to the Oscal Pad 10.
- Rugged design may add to the device's weight.
Blackview Oscal Pad 10
- More affordable price point.
- Sufficient for basic tasks like web browsing and video playback.
- Lightweight design (likely).
- Slow 10W charging.
- Unisoc T606 chipset struggles with demanding applications.
- Limited long-term performance potential.
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for the Oscal Pad 10, the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra’s performance is the primary focus. The Dimensity 7400X chipset is capable of driving high-resolution displays at smooth refresh rates, suggesting a quality panel. The Oscal Pad 10’s Unisoc T606, being a lower-tier chipset, likely pairs with a more basic display to maintain affordability. The Ulefone’s processor will also handle more complex graphical rendering, resulting in a better visual experience for gaming and video editing.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both devices. However, given the Oscal Pad 10’s budget positioning, it’s likely to feature a simpler camera system. The Ulefone, while not explicitly detailed, benefits from the processing power of the Dimensity 7400X, which can enhance image processing and potentially support more advanced camera features. Without specific sensor information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Ulefone’s chipset provides a foundation for a potentially superior camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Blackview Oscal Pad 10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7400X translates to superior power efficiency and reduced heat generation, allowing for sustained performance under load. The Dimensity 7400X’s octa-core configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a substantial performance boost over the Oscal Pad 10’s (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Ulefone.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 120W wired charging capability, compared to the Oscal Pad 10’s 10W wired charging. This means the Ulefone can go from 0-100% in a fraction of the time. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Ulefone’s 401:34h endurance rating suggests efficient power management, and the 1000 cycle lifespan indicates long-term battery health. The Oscal Pad 10’s slower charging will require significantly more time to replenish the battery, making it less convenient for users on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding applications, require extremely fast charging for minimal downtime, and value a more future-proofed processor. Buy the Blackview Oscal Pad 10 if you prioritize affordability above all else, primarily need a tablet for basic tasks like web browsing and video playback, and aren't concerned with high-end performance or rapid charging.