Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra vs Blackview Active 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and extended battery life, the Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset and significantly longer 187:37h endurance outweigh the Blackview Active 8 Pro’s slightly more affordable price point. However, the Blackview’s phone form factor is preferable for those needing constant communication on the go.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra | Blackview Active 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 25, 26, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2023, July 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 261.7 x 166.8 x 14.3 mm (10.30 x 6.57 x 0.56 in) | 256.3 x 165.8 x 16.8 mm (10.09 x 6.53 x 0.66 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 834.5 g (1.84 lb) | 976 g (2.15 lb) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Mohs level 7 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~225 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~225 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.36 inches, 305.5 cm2 (~70.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.36 inches, 305.5 cm2 (~71.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, Doke OS_P 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.25", PDAF |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3" |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM Radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11800 mAh | 22000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 187:37h endurance, 1000 cycles | 152:42h endurance, 800 cycles |
| Energy | Class D | Class G |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | Class A (211 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra
- Superior battery endurance (187:37h)
- More powerful Dimensity 6300 chipset
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Larger form factor may be less portable
- Tablet form factor less convenient for quick communication
Blackview Active 8 Pro
- More compact and portable phone form factor
- Potentially lower price point
- Easier one-handed operation
- Integrated cellular connectivity for immediate communication
- Shorter battery life (152:42h)
- Less powerful Helio G99 chipset
- Fewer battery charge cycles (800)
Display Comparison
While both devices share a 6nm process node for their respective chipsets, the display details are absent. Assuming typical rugged device displays, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels for durability. The Ulefone’s larger tablet form factor will offer a more immersive viewing experience, but without specific brightness (nits) or color accuracy data, a direct comparison is difficult. Bezels are likely substantial on both to enhance drop protection.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided, making a detailed comparison impossible. However, given the rugged nature of both devices, we can expect a focus on practicality over high-end photography. The absence of detailed sensor information suggests neither device will excel in low-light conditions. Image processing will likely prioritize clarity and robustness over artistic flair. Without knowing the megapixel counts or lens apertures, it’s safe to assume both cameras are adequate for documentation and basic photography.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) offers a slight performance advantage over the Blackview Active 8 Pro’s Helio G99 (6nm). Both CPUs feature the same core configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), but the Dimensity 6300’s higher clock speed and more modern architecture translate to faster processing speeds. This difference will be noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing or running complex applications. The Ulefone’s potential for better thermal management, due to the larger chassis, could also lead to less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving 187:37h compared to the Blackview Active 8 Pro’s 152:42h. This 23% increase in endurance is crucial for users operating in remote locations without access to charging. Both devices support 33W wired charging, but the Ulefone’s larger battery capacity will take longer to fully recharge. The Ulefone also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up smaller devices in the field, which the Blackview lacks. The Ulefone’s battery also supports 1000 charge cycles, suggesting greater long-term reliability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra if you need a large-screen device for field work, detailed mapping, or extended media consumption where access to power is limited. Its tablet form factor and superior battery endurance make it ideal for professionals and enthusiasts alike. Buy the Blackview Active 8 Pro if you prefer a more compact, pocketable rugged device for communication, quick data capture, and situations where a phone-first experience is essential. It’s a better fit for first responders or those needing a reliable communication tool in challenging conditions.