Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra Thermal vs. Oukitel WP17: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra Thermal emerges as the stronger choice. Its more modern 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset offers superior efficiency and potential for sustained performance compared to the 12nm Helio G95 in the Oukitel WP17, alongside the unique thermal imaging capability. While the WP17 is a capable device, the Ulefone offers a more future-proof platform.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra Thermal | Oukitel WP17 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2021, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2021, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 261.7 x 166.8 x 14.3 mm (10.30 x 6.57 x 0.56 in) | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 834.5 g (1.84 lb) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~225 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.36 inches, 305.5 cm2 (~70.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm Thermal camera by ThermoVue, 160x120 px, 25Hz, 12μm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Yes |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Unspecified |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 11800 mAh | Li-Po 8300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Blue, Camo, Camouflage |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 240 EUR |
Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra Thermal
- Integrated thermal camera for specialized use cases.
- More efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset for better performance and battery life.
- Faster 33W wired charging.
- Likely higher quality display.
- Larger form factor may not suit all users.
- Potentially higher price point.
Oukitel WP17
- More affordable price point.
- Potentially more compact size.
- Proven Helio G95 chipset offers adequate performance for everyday tasks.
- Rugged design provides excellent durability.
- Less efficient Helio G95 chipset.
- Lacks thermal imaging capabilities.
- Likely slower charging speeds.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor Pad 4 Ultra Thermal's positioning as a 'premium' rugged tablet, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and brightness than the Oukitel WP17. The larger screen size of the Ulefone, typical for a 'Pad' designation, will benefit media consumption and productivity. Bezels are likely to be similar on both, prioritizing durability over a sleek aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
The Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra Thermal's key differentiator is its integrated thermal camera, a feature absent on the Oukitel WP17. This immediately positions the Ulefone as the superior choice for professionals in fields like building inspection, electrical maintenance, or search and rescue. Beyond the thermal camera, details on the primary camera sensors are missing. However, given the Ulefone's higher price point, it's reasonable to expect a more capable main sensor and image processing pipeline than the WP17. We can assume the WP17 will include standard camera features, but it won't match the specialized utility of the Ulefone.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone's Dimensity 6300 (6nm) boasts a more efficient architecture than the Oukitel's Helio G95 (12nm). While both CPUs feature a similar core configuration – 2x Cortex-A76 and 6x Cortex-A55 – the 6nm process allows the Dimensity 6300 to deliver comparable performance with lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling. This translates to longer sustained performance during demanding tasks like video editing or gaming. The Dimensity 6300 also benefits from newer CPU and GPU architectures, offering a performance edge. The WP17's G95 is a proven performer, but it's showing its age.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra Thermal benefits from the more efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset. This means it will likely achieve comparable or better battery life than the Oukitel WP17, even with a similar battery capacity. The Ulefone also offers 33W wired charging and 5W reverse wired charging, providing faster replenishment and the ability to charge other devices. The WP17's charging speed is unknown, but is likely slower.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor Pad 4 Ultra Thermal if you need a tablet with integrated thermal imaging for inspections, maintenance, or outdoor exploration, and prioritize a more efficient processor for longer runtimes. Buy the Oukitel WP17 if you are seeking a more budget-friendly rugged tablet for basic tasks and don't require the advanced features of the Ulefone, or if you specifically need a smaller form factor.