Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro vs. Blackview Active 8 Pro: A Rugged Tablet Battle

The rugged tablet market is heating up, offering durable devices for demanding professionals and outdoor enthusiasts. The Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro and Blackview Active 8 Pro both aim to deliver resilience, but they take different approaches to performance and battery life. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing maximum battery endurance and sustained performance under load, the Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro emerges as the winner. Its larger battery capacity and efficient chipset provide 166:39h of endurance, while the Blackview Active 8 Pro focuses on faster processing with a more power-hungry chipset.

PHONES
Phone Names Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro Blackview Active 8 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 25, 26, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2024, April2023, July 03
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, AprilAvailable. Released 2023, July 10
Body
Dimensions261.7 x 166.8 x 21.2 mm (10.30 x 6.57 x 0.83 in)256.3 x 165.8 x 16.8 mm (10.09 x 6.53 x 0.66 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight1243 g (2.74 lb)976 g (2.15 lb)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4Mohs level 7
Resolution1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~225 ppi density)1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~225 ppi density)
Size10.36 inches, 305.5 cm2 (~70.0% screen-to-body ratio)10.36 inches, 305.5 cm2 (~71.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT8788 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
GPUMali-G72 MP3Mali-G57 MC2
OSAndroid 13Android 12, Doke OS_P 3.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal256GB 8GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm48 MP, (wide), 1/2.25", PDAF
Video1080p@30fps1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8"16 MP, (wide), 1/3"
VideoYesYes
Sound
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP5.0, A2DP
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioWireless FM radio, RDS, recordingFM Radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG, HDMI, magnetic connectorUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging66W wired 5W reverse wired33W wired
TypeLi-Po 33280 mAh22000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlackBlack, Orange
PriceAbout 370 EURAbout 220 EUR
EU LABEL
Battery166:39h endurance, 1000 cycles152:42h endurance, 800 cycles
EnergyClass DClass G
Free fallClass A (208 falls)Class A (211 falls)
RepairabilityClass CClass C

Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro

  • Exceptional battery endurance (166:39h)
  • Long-lasting battery health (1000 charge cycles)
  • Faster 66W wired charging

  • Older chipset (MT8788)
  • Potentially lower single-core performance

Blackview Active 8 Pro

  • More modern chipset (Helio G99)
  • Faster CPU cores (Cortex-A76)
  • More efficient 6nm process

  • Shorter battery life (152:42h)
  • Fewer battery charge cycles (800)

Display Comparison

Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged nature of both devices, we can assume both utilize durable, likely IPS LCD panels. The focus here will be on the internal components affecting performance. The absence of high refresh rate or OLED technology is expected in this segment.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are not provided, so analysis is limited. Given the target audience, we can expect both tablets to feature cameras suitable for documentation and basic photography. The absence of detailed specs suggests neither device prioritizes camera performance as a key selling point. Expect functional, but not exceptional, image quality.

Performance

The Blackview Active 8 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) chipset represents a significant architectural leap over the Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro’s Mediatek MT8788 (12nm). The G99 utilizes newer Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.2 GHz) compared to the A73 cores (4x2.0 GHz) in the MT8788, resulting in noticeably faster single-core performance. However, the MT8788’s eight cores offer strong multi-core capabilities. The 6nm process of the G99 also translates to improved power efficiency, but this is offset by the higher clock speeds and more powerful cores. The Ulefone's chipset is older, but the larger battery capacity mitigates the efficiency difference.

Battery Life

Battery life is a key differentiator. The Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro boasts a 166:39h endurance rating, significantly exceeding the Blackview Active 8 Pro’s 152:42h. This advantage is coupled with a remarkable 1000 charge cycles, suggesting long-term battery health. While the Blackview Active 8 Pro offers faster 33W wired charging, the Ulefone’s 66W charging is still rapid and the larger battery capacity means even a full charge will last considerably longer. The Ulefone prioritizes longevity and sustained use, while the Blackview focuses on quicker top-ups.

Buying Guide

Buy the Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro if you need a tablet for extended field work, long shifts, or situations where access to power is limited. Its exceptional battery life and 1000 charge cycles offer peace of mind. Buy the Blackview Active 8 Pro if you prioritize responsiveness for tasks like multitasking, light gaming, and quick app launches, and are willing to trade some battery life for a more modern chipset.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Blackview Active 8 Pro’s Helio G99 chipset struggle with demanding applications over extended periods?
The Helio G99 is a capable chipset, but its higher power draw compared to the Ulefone’s MT8788, combined with the smaller battery capacity, means it may experience more noticeable performance throttling during prolonged use of resource-intensive apps. The Ulefone’s larger battery provides a buffer against this.
❓ How does the 66W charging on the Ulefone Armor Pad 3 Pro compare to the 33W charging on the Blackview Active 8 Pro in real-world use?
While 66W is faster on paper, the difference in 0-100% charge times may not be dramatic due to the Ulefone’s larger battery. However, the 66W charging will provide a more significant boost in a shorter amount of time, offering a quicker top-up when you only have a limited window to charge.
❓ Is the 800 charge cycle limit on the Blackview Active 8 Pro a significant concern?
800 charge cycles is a reasonable number, but it's lower than the Ulefone's 1000. This means the Blackview's battery will likely degrade faster over the long term, potentially requiring replacement sooner. For users who charge their tablets daily, this difference will be more noticeable.