Ulefone Armor Mini 20 vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and extended battery life, the Ulefone Armor Mini 20 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G99 chipset and impressive 58:42h endurance outweigh the Nokia XR20’s 5G capabilities for most rugged phone users who aren't heavily reliant on constant, high-bandwidth data.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor Mini 20 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 133.5 x 63.3 x 24.9 mm (5.26 x 2.49 x 0.98 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 301 g (10.62 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~373 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.7 inches, 53.3 cm2 (~63.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 6200 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | - | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 58:42h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor Mini 20
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with the Helio G99
- Exceptional battery life (58:42h endurance)
- Faster charging speeds (33W wired, 15W wireless, 5W reverse wireless)
- May lack the software polish and update commitment of Nokia
- 5G connectivity is absent
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Nokia’s reputation for software updates and security
- Potentially better thermal management due to 8nm process
- Less powerful processor compared to the Helio G99
- Shorter battery life compared to the Ulefone Armor Mini 20
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. While specific display specs are missing, the focus on ruggedness suggests both will prioritize durability over peak visual fidelity. However, the chipset difference hints at potential display driver optimizations. The G99’s more powerful GPU could translate to smoother scrolling and animations, even on a similar panel. The Nokia XR20’s 8nm Snapdragon 480 may be more power efficient in driving the display, potentially contributing to overall battery savings, but at the cost of graphical performance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference provides clues. The Helio G99’s image signal processor (ISP) is likely more capable than the Snapdragon 480’s, potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The Nokia XR20’s brand reputation suggests a focus on natural color reproduction, while Ulefone often leans towards more vibrant, saturated images. The absence of information on sensor sizes and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the G99’s processing power gives the Ulefone an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Armor Mini 20’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores versus the Nokia XR20’s 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 cores. This, combined with the more efficient 6nm process, suggests a significant performance advantage for the Ulefone in CPU-intensive tasks. While the Snapdragon 480 offers 5G connectivity, its Kryo 460 cores are less performant. The G99’s superior GPU will also provide a better gaming experience. The Nokia XR20’s 8nm process *should* offer better thermal efficiency, but the G99’s architecture is designed for mobile gaming, suggesting Ulefone has considered thermal management.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor Mini 20’s 58:42h endurance is a standout feature, significantly exceeding what’s typically expected from a phone in this class. This is likely due to the efficient 6nm Helio G99 chipset and optimized power management. While the Nokia XR20’s battery capacity is unknown, its less powerful chipset and 8nm process may offer comparable efficiency, but it won’t match the Ulefone’s sheer endurance. The Ulefone also offers faster 33W wired charging, 15W wireless, and even 5W reverse wireless charging, providing greater flexibility compared to the Nokia’s 18W wired and 15W wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor Mini 20 if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like outdoor work, extended GPS navigation, or occasional gaming, and value long battery life above all else. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize 5G connectivity for streaming or remote work, and prefer a more polished software experience with guaranteed updates, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power and battery endurance.