Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro, coupled with faster charging speeds and wireless charging capabilities. While the Cat S62 Pro has a brand reputation, the Ulefone delivers more value for the money.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 133.5 x 63.3 x 24.9 mm (5.26 x 2.49 x 0.98 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 301 g (10.62 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~373 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.7 inches, 53.3 cm2 (~63.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm Night vision camera | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 6200 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 6300
- Faster charging speeds (33W wired)
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Long-term software support is uncertain
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation for ruggedness
- Potentially more mature software experience
- Proven durability
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 processor
- Slower charging speeds
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro's release date, it likely utilizes an older LCD panel. The Ulefone, being newer, *may* incorporate a more modern panel technology, potentially offering improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of refresh rate data suggests both likely operate at a standard 60Hz. Bezels are likely substantial on both, given the rugged design focus.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will prioritize practicality over photographic excellence. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes it hard to assess low-light performance. It's reasonable to assume the Ulefone, being newer, may benefit from improved image processing algorithms, but this is speculative. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing gimmick with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a substantial leap in architecture compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core performance than the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz. The 6nm process node also translates to improved power efficiency, meaning the Ulefone should deliver better battery life under sustained load. The Snapdragon 660, while capable, is showing its age, and will struggle with modern, demanding applications. The Ulefone will benefit users who need to run multiple apps simultaneously or engage in moderate gaming.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro’s charging capabilities are a clear advantage. 33W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wireless charging provide significant flexibility. The Cat S62 Pro likely relies solely on slower wired charging. The Ulefone’s faster charging will drastically reduce downtime, while wireless charging adds convenience. Even with a similar battery capacity, the Dimensity 6300’s superior power efficiency should translate to longer real-world usage on the Ulefone.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro if you prioritize processing power for multitasking, gaming, or demanding applications, and value faster charging and wireless charging convenience. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you specifically trust the Cat brand's long-standing reputation in rugged devices and require a phone with established software support, even if it means sacrificing some performance and modern features.