Ulefone Armor 6S vs. Armor 7E: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 7E is the better choice. The Helio P90 chipset provides a noticeable uplift in CPU and GPU performance, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. However, the Armor 6S remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who don't demand the absolute highest processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 6S | Ulefone Armor 7E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, October | 2020, March 30. Released 2020, March 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 166 x 83 x 13.3 mm (6.54 x 3.27 x 0.52 in) | 165.9 x 81 x 13.6 mm (6.53 x 3.19 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 270 g (9.52 oz) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2246 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 96.9 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~72.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | 5-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, uv sensor | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 10W wireless | 15W wired 10W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Red | Black |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 6S
- Faster wired charging (18W)
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Older Helio P70 chipset
- Less capable CPU and GPU
- May struggle with demanding applications
Ulefone Armor 7E
- More powerful Helio P90 chipset
- Improved CPU and GPU performance
- Better multitasking and gaming experience
- Slower wired charging (15W)
- Potentially higher price
- May not see a huge battery life improvement
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature similar LCD panels given Ulefone's typical specifications. However, detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing. The focus here is on durability, and both are built to withstand harsh conditions. The lack of high refresh rate or advanced panel technology is typical for this segment, prioritizing robustness over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature similar camera setups geared towards practicality rather than professional photography. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio P90 should offer improved image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction compared to the P70. However, the quality will heavily depend on the sensor and lens used, which are currently unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Armor 7E’s Mediatek Helio P90 represents a significant upgrade over the Armor 6S’s Helio P70. The P90 utilizes a more modern CPU architecture with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 cores alongside 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, compared to the P70’s 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A53 configuration. This translates to approximately 20-30% faster CPU performance in multi-core tasks. The P90 also boasts a more powerful GPU, offering a better gaming experience. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural improvements in the P90 provide a clear advantage for users who frequently multitask or play graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Both devices support 10W wireless charging, a convenient feature for rugged phones. The Armor 6S offers 18W wired charging, while the Armor 7E is limited to 15W. While the Armor 6S charges slightly faster, the difference is unlikely to be substantial in real-world usage. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the rugged design, both likely house batteries in the 5000-6000 mAh range. The more efficient Helio P90 in the Armor 7E may contribute to slightly better battery life despite the potentially faster charging of the 6S.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 6S if you need a reliable, rugged phone for basic tasks like communication, navigation, and occasional photography, and prioritize cost savings. Buy the Ulefone Armor 7E if you prefer a more responsive experience for demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and want a device that will remain capable for longer.