Ulefone Armor 34 vs. Doogee S98 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and longevity, the Ulefone Armor 34 emerges as the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Doogee S98 Pro’s Helio G96, coupled with faster 66W charging and impressive battery endurance. While the Doogee offers wireless charging, the Armor 34’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 34 | Doogee S98 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2022, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 18 | Available. Released 2022, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.1 x 86.6 x 32.7 mm (7.21 x 3.41 x 1.29 in) | 172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 763 g (1.68 lb) | 320 g (11.29 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights Thermal imaging camera |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p, 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 33W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 25500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | € 459.99 / $ 413.32 / £ 369.99 | About 470 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 384:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (88 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 34
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300)
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Exceptional battery endurance (384:54h)
- No wireless charging
- Rugged design may be bulky for some users
Doogee S98 Pro
- Wireless charging support
- Potentially lower price point
- Rugged design for durability
- Slower processor (Helio G96)
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Lower battery endurance
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 34's focus on modern internals, it's reasonable to expect a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The S98 Pro, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. Users should investigate independent reviews for detailed display analysis, focusing on outdoor visibility and color gamut coverage.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the chipset difference suggests the Armor 34 will have a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The S98 Pro’s older chipset may struggle with complex computational photography tasks. Users should focus on independent camera reviews to assess real-world image quality, paying attention to dynamic range and detail preservation.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 34’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Doogee S98 Pro’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 7300’s octa-core configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency compared to the Helio G96’s (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This benefits gamers and users who frequently multitask.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 34 boasts impressive battery endurance, rated at 384:54h, and supports 66W wired charging. This significantly outperforms the Doogee S98 Pro’s 33W wired charging and 15W wireless charging. The Armor 34’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups, while the longer endurance minimizes the need for frequent charging. The Armor 34 also claims 1000 battery cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan compared to the S98 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 34 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. Its superior chipset and faster charging will be invaluable. Buy the Doogee S98 Pro if you prioritize wireless charging convenience and are primarily focused on basic smartphone functions, accepting a performance trade-off for that feature.