Ulefone Armor 34 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 34 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660. While both are rugged, the Armor 34 offers a more modern experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 34 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 18 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 183.1 x 86.6 x 32.7 mm (7.21 x 3.41 x 1.29 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 763 g (1.68 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 25500 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | € 459.99 / $ 413.32 / £ 369.99 | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 384:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (88 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 34
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 7300
- Faster 66W charging for quicker power-ups
- Potentially longer battery lifespan with 1000 charge cycles
- Rugged phone software experience may be less refined than Cat
- Display specifications are unknown
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Proven reliability and durability
- Potentially better software support within the Cat ecosystem
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 processor limits performance
- Slower charging speeds (specifications unavailable)
- Less efficient processor leads to potentially shorter battery life
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the Armor 34 is a newer device, it likely features a more modern panel with higher brightness and potentially a higher refresh rate. The Cat S62 Pro, being older, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The Armor 34’s newer display tech would benefit users consuming media outdoors or in bright environments. Bezels are also likely slimmer on the Armor 34, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the chipset difference suggests the Armor 34 will have a more advanced image signal processor (ISP). This allows for better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. While both phones likely feature similar basic camera setups, the Armor 34’s ISP will enable more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of information on sensor sizes makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Armor 34’s newer platform suggests a more capable camera system.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 34’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Dimensity 7300’s octa-core configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) offers significantly higher clock speeds and utilizes more efficient CPU cores. The 4nm process node further enhances efficiency, reducing heat and improving sustained performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience for Armor 34 users. The Snapdragon 660, while capable, will struggle with demanding applications and may exhibit noticeable throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 34 boasts impressive battery endurance, rated at 384:54h, and supports 66W wired charging. This is a significant advantage over the Cat S62 Pro, which lacks specific battery endurance or charging speed data. The 66W charging on the Armor 34 will dramatically reduce charging times, getting you back in the field faster. The Armor 34’s 10W reverse wired charging is also a useful feature for topping up accessories. The Armor 34’s 1000 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 34 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running complex work applications. Its superior processing power and faster charging are ideal for professionals and power users. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a proven, reliable platform and are less concerned with cutting-edge performance. It remains a solid choice for basic communication and essential field work, especially if you already operate within a Cat ecosystem.