Ulefone Armor 34 Pro vs. Doogee S98 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and longevity, the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro emerges as the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers significantly more processing power and efficiency than the Doogee S98 Pro’s Helio G96, translating to smoother multitasking and better sustained performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 34 Pro | Doogee S98 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2022, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2022, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.1 x 86.6 x 32.7 mm (7.21 x 3.41 x 1.29 in) | 172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 825 g (1.82 lb) | 320 g (11.29 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights Thermal imaging camera |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p, 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 33W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 25500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | € 637.49 / $ 516.41 / £ 479.99 / ₹ 81,500 | About 470 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 384:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (88 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 34 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300)
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- No wireless charging
- Potentially higher price point
Doogee S98 Pro
- Wireless charging support
- Potentially lower price
- Established rugged phone brand
- Slower processor (Helio G96)
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Less efficient 12nm process
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 34 Pro's focus on modern processing, it's reasonable to expect a higher-quality panel with potentially higher peak brightness and refresh rate. The S98 Pro, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. Users should investigate independent reviews for detailed display analysis, focusing on outdoor visibility and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided, so analysis relies on brand positioning. Doogee often emphasizes megapixel count, while Ulefone tends to focus on overall image quality. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. However, the Armor 34 Pro’s more powerful processor likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. Users should consult camera samples from independent reviews to assess real-world image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) is a modern, octa-core processor featuring four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture, combined with the smaller 4nm fabrication process, delivers significantly improved performance and power efficiency compared to the Doogee S98 Pro’s Helio G96 (12nm). The G96, with its 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is a capable mid-range chip, but it simply cannot compete with the Dimensity 7300 in demanding scenarios. The 4nm process allows the Armor 34 Pro to maintain higher clock speeds for longer periods without significant thermal throttling, benefiting gamers and power users.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro boasts impressive battery endurance, rated at 384:54h, and supports 66W wired charging. This rapid charging capability allows for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Doogee S98 Pro’s 33W wired charging. While the S98 Pro offers 15W wireless charging, the Armor 34 Pro’s faster wired charging and potentially more efficient chipset (due to the 4nm process) likely offset the convenience of wireless charging for most users. The Armor 34 Pro also claims 1000 battery cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan than the S98 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive work applications. Its superior chipset and faster charging will keep you productive on the go. Buy the Doogee S98 Pro if you prioritize wireless charging and are looking for a more budget-friendly rugged option, understanding that you’ll be making compromises in processing power and overall system responsiveness.