Ulefone Armor 34 Pro vs. Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage and superior efficiency. However, those who value wireless charging and a more established brand may prefer the Cat S75.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 34 Pro | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 183.1 x 86.6 x 32.7 mm (7.21 x 3.41 x 1.29 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 825 g (1.82 lb) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 25500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | € 637.49 / $ 516.41 / £ 479.99 / ₹ 81,500 | About 600 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 384:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (88 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 34 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300)
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Exceptional battery endurance (384:54h)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Less established brand reputation
Cat S75
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Well-known and trusted brand (Cat)
- Potentially better outdoor visibility (assumed)
- Older and less powerful chipset (Dimensity 930)
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 34 Pro's focus on newer technology, it's reasonable to expect a higher refresh rate or improved color accuracy. The Cat S75, benefiting from Cat's established position, likely prioritizes outdoor visibility with a bright panel and anti-glare coating. The absence of details necessitates assuming both utilize durable, scratch-resistant glass, a standard for rugged phones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the chipset difference suggests the Armor 34 Pro benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Cat S75 likely relies on software optimization to compensate for its older chipset. Both phones likely feature multiple cameras, but the absence of sensor size or aperture information prevents a meaningful assessment of their photographic capabilities. We can assume both will include standard features like HDR and panorama modes.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a significant leap over the Cat S75's Dimensity 930 (6nm). The 4nm process inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, translating to less throttling during sustained workloads. While the Cat S75's CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is respectable, the Armor 34 Pro's (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) boasts higher clock speeds on its prime cores. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and gaming. The Armor 34 Pro is likely to deliver a smoother, more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro boasts impressive endurance with a reported 384:54h rating and 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a focus on long-term battery health. Its 66W wired charging is significantly faster than the Cat S75's 15W wireless charging. While the Cat S75 offers the convenience of wireless charging, the Armor 34 Pro's faster wired charging and superior endurance provide a more practical advantage for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day. The 10W reverse wired charging on the Armor 34 Pro is a bonus for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. Its superior processor and faster charging will be invaluable. Buy the Cat S75 if you prefer the convenience of wireless charging, prioritize a well-known brand reputation for ruggedness, and don't require the absolute highest level of processing power.