Ulefone Armor 34 Pro vs. Blackview BV9300: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99, coupled with faster 66W charging. While the BV9300 remains a capable device, the Armor 34 Pro justifies its price premium with superior processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 34 Pro | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.1 x 86.6 x 32.7 mm (7.21 x 3.41 x 1.29 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 825 g (1.82 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 25500 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | € 637.49 / $ 516.41 / £ 479.99 / ₹ 81,500 | About 390 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 384:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (88 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 34 Pro
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 7300
- Faster 66W wired charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially longer battery life due to chipset efficiency
- Likely higher price point
- May generate more heat under extreme load (though 4nm helps)
Blackview BV9300
- More affordable price point
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Decent battery life for moderate usage
- Slower Helio G99 processor
- Slower 33W charging
- Less future-proofed chipset
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 34 Pro’s focus on higher-end components, it’s reasonable to expect a brighter panel and potentially a higher refresh rate. The BV9300, targeting a more budget-conscious segment, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz panel. Bezels are likely comparable, given the rugged design constraints of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the Armor 34 Pro will have a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. The Armor 34 Pro’s processing power will allow for more complex computational photography features. The BV9300 will likely offer a competent camera experience for casual users, but will struggle to match the Armor 34 Pro’s capabilities in challenging conditions.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7300’s octa-core configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency compared to the Helio G99’s (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The 4nm process node further enhances efficiency, leading to less heat generation and sustained performance during prolonged use. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience for the Armor 34 Pro.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro boasts impressive battery endurance, rated at 384:54h, and supports 66W wired charging. The Blackview BV9300 offers a more modest 33W wired charging and 5W reverse wired charging. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified, the Armor 34 Pro’s endurance rating suggests a larger battery combined with the more efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset. The 66W charging will significantly reduce charging times, getting you back up and running faster than the BV9300’s 33W solution. The Armor 34 Pro also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. Its advanced chipset and faster charging will be invaluable. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prioritize value and a reliable, albeit less powerful, experience for everyday tasks like communication, navigation, and basic photography. It’s a solid choice for those on a tighter budget.