Ulefone Armor 34 Pro vs. Blackview BV8900: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro is the clear winner. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 7300 chipset, coupled with 66W fast charging and a projected 384:54h endurance, provides a superior user experience compared to the Blackview BV8900’s aging Helio P90.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 34 Pro | Blackview BV8900 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, May 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2023, June 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.1 x 86.6 x 32.7 mm (7.21 x 3.41 x 1.29 in) | 172.4 x 82.2 x 19.8 mm (6.79 x 3.24 x 0.78 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 825 g (1.82 lb) | 398 g (14.04 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.8 cm2 (~71.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", PDAF, OIS 5 MP, thermal assisted camera FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 33W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 25500 mAh | 10380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | € 637.49 / $ 516.41 / £ 479.99 / ₹ 81,500 | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 384:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (88 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 34 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300)
- Faster 66W charging
- Superior battery endurance (384:54h)
- Likely higher price point
- May be larger and heavier due to advanced components
Blackview BV8900
- More affordable price
- Rugged design for durability
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Outdated Helio P90 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Lower overall performance
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, but given the market segment, both likely feature IPS LCD panels. However, the Armor 34 Pro’s chipset suggests potential for a higher refresh rate display, which the BV8900 likely lacks. The BV8900’s older chipset may limit its ability to drive a high-resolution or high-refresh-rate panel efficiently. Expect both to prioritize durability over display fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but the chipset difference hints at superior image processing capabilities in the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro. The Dimensity 7300 includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the Armor 34 Pro will likely excel in low-light photography and video recording due to its superior processing power. Expect the BV8900 to rely more on software enhancements to compensate for its less capable ISP.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Blackview BV8900’s Helio P90 (12nm). The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core performance than the BV8900’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The BV8900’s Helio P90, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking compared to the Armor 34 Pro.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro boasts a remarkable 384:54h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified, the Dimensity 7300’s power efficiency contributes significantly. The 66W wired charging is a major advantage, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Blackview BV8900’s 33W charging. The Armor 34 Pro also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the BV8900, enabling it to charge other devices on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro if you prioritize performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value faster charging speeds and longer battery life. Buy the Blackview BV8900 if you are on a tighter budget and primarily need a durable phone for basic communication and light use, accepting compromises in processing power and charging speed.