Ulefone Armor 33 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 33 emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Helio G100 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660, coupled with substantially faster 66W charging. While the Cat S62 Pro has brand recognition, the Armor 33 delivers more for the money.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 33 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 18 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 185.5 x 85.5 x 34 mm (7.30 x 3.37 x 1.34 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 765 g (1.69 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (118dB) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | - |
| Type | 25500 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | € 324.95 / $ 299.00 / £ 289.99 | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 381:42h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 33
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G100)
- Ultra-fast 66W charging
- Exceptional battery endurance (381:42h)
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Display specifications are unknown
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation in rugged phones
- Potentially brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Proven durability and reliability
- Older, less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely shorter battery life
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 33's focus on modern technology, it's reasonable to expect a higher resolution and potentially a higher refresh rate panel than the S62 Pro, which likely utilizes an older LCD technology. The S62 Pro's brand history suggests a focus on outdoor visibility, so it may have a brighter panel, but without specific nit ratings, this remains speculative. Bezels are likely similar, given the rugged design constraints of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will prioritize practicality over photographic excellence. The Armor 33, being newer, likely benefits from improved image processing algorithms. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures makes it impossible to determine which phone captures better images in low-light conditions. It's safe to assume both will include basic camera features suitable for documentation and casual photography, but not for serious enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Armor 33’s Mediatek Helio G100 (6nm) represents a significant leap forward in efficiency and performance compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process allows for higher transistor density and lower power consumption, translating to better sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Cortex-A76 cores in the G100 offer a substantial performance uplift over the Kryo 260 Gold cores in the Snapdragon 660. This means the Armor 33 will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 33 boasts a remarkable 381:42h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the older, less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset will likely result in shorter runtimes. Crucially, the Armor 33 supports 66W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster replenishment compared to the S62 Pro’s likely slower charging speeds. The Armor 33 also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories in the field.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 33 if you need a rugged phone with modern processing power for demanding tasks, fast charging to minimize downtime, and a longer-term software support outlook. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a well-established brand with a proven track record in the rugged space, and are less concerned with having the absolute latest chipset technology or fastest charging speeds.