Ulefone Armor 33 Pro vs. Doogee S96 GT: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Armor 33 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 7300X chipset, coupled with 66W fast charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage over the Doogee S96 GT, justifying the potential price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 33 Pro | Doogee S96 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 18 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 185.5 x 85.5 x 34 mm (7.30 x 3.37 x 1.34 in) | 167 x 81.4 x 15.5 mm (6.57 x 3.20 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 776.5 g (1.71 lb) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~71.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (118dB) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 24W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 25500 mAh | 6350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Gold |
| Price | € 455.99 / $ 395.57 / £ 359.99 | About 340 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 383:36h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 33 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300X)
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Longer battery endurance (383h)
- Potentially higher price
- No wireless charging
Doogee S96 GT
- Wireless charging support
- Potentially lower price
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Slower processor (Helio G95)
- Slower 24W wired charging
- Lower overall performance
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 33 Pro's focus on modern hardware, it likely benefits from a more advanced panel with potentially higher peak brightness and color accuracy. The S96 GT, being an older model, may exhibit wider bezels and a less refined display experience. The inclusion of 10W reverse wired charging on the Ulefone suggests a more modern feature set.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the Armor 33 Pro will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. The S96 GT’s older chipset may struggle with complex image processing algorithms. We can assume both phones will feature multiple cameras, but the Armor 33 Pro is likely to offer more advanced features like improved dynamic range and faster autofocus.
Performance
The performance gap between these two is substantial. The Ulefone Armor 33 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4nm) is a significant leap forward compared to the Doogee S96 GT’s Helio G95 (12nm). The Dimensity 7300X utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, offering considerably more processing power than the S96 GT’s 2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300X also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use. This benefits users who engage in mobile gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive activities.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 33 Pro boasts a remarkable 383-hour endurance rating and supports 66W wired charging, while the Doogee S96 GT offers 24W wired and 15W wireless charging. The faster charging speed of the Armor 33 Pro significantly reduces charging times, a crucial benefit for users who rely on their phone throughout the day. While the S96 GT’s wireless charging is a convenience feature, the Armor 33 Pro’s superior endurance and charging speed provide a more practical advantage. The 1000 cycle battery life claim for the Ulefone also suggests a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 33 Pro if you prioritize sustained performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value faster charging speeds for minimal downtime. Buy the Doogee S96 GT if you're on a tighter budget and primarily need a reliable, durable phone for basic communication and light usage, and wireless charging is a must-have feature.