Ulefone Armor 30 Pro vs. Blackview BV9800 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 30 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300X chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power over the Blackview BV9800 Pro’s Helio P70, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the BV9800 Pro remains a capable device, it’s showing its age.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 30 Pro | Blackview BV9800 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 03 | 2019, October 28. Released 2019, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 03 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 181.3 x 84.9 x 21.2 mm (7.14 x 3.34 x 0.83 in) | 168.5 x 81 x 14.8 mm (6.63 x 3.19 x 0.58 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 509 g (1.12 lb) | 322 g (11.36 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~74.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V/CT Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, thermal assisted camera FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (118dB) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 12800 mAh | 6580 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange |
| Price | € 459.99 / $ 354.49 / £ 319.99 | About 340 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 142:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 30 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300X)
- Faster 66W charging
- Longer battery endurance (142 hours)
- Price likely higher than BV9800 Pro
- Specific display details unknown
Blackview BV9800 Pro
- Proven rugged design
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Outdated Helio P70 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Lower performance for demanding apps
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided for either device. However, given the Armor 30 Pro’s newer release, it likely benefits from a more modern panel with potentially higher peak brightness and improved color accuracy. The BV9800 Pro, being an older model, may exhibit wider bezels and a less refined display experience. The Armor 30 Pro’s potential for a higher refresh rate (not specified) would also contribute to smoother visuals.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, the Armor 30 Pro’s newer chipset likely includes a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), enabling superior image processing capabilities. While sensor size and megapixel count are unknown for both, the Armor 30 Pro’s ISP will likely deliver better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The BV9800 Pro’s older ISP may struggle in low-light conditions and produce less detailed images. We can assume both devices include standard features like HDR, but the Armor 30 Pro will likely implement them more effectively.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is significant. The Ulefone Armor 30 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4nm) chipset, with its octa-core configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), represents a generational leap over the Blackview BV9800 Pro’s Helio P70 (12nm). The Dimensity 7300X’s newer architecture and smaller fabrication node translate to substantially improved CPU and GPU performance, as well as better power efficiency. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Armor 30 Pro are significantly more powerful than the Cortex-A73 cores in the BV9800 Pro, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The 4nm process also means less heat generation under load, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 30 Pro boasts a remarkable 142-hour endurance rating, suggesting excellent battery optimization despite not specifying the battery capacity. The Blackview BV9800 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but its older chipset and larger fabrication node likely result in lower energy efficiency. The Armor 30 Pro’s 66W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the BV9800 Pro’s 18W charging. The Armor 30 Pro also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 30 Pro if you need a rugged phone that can handle demanding tasks like video editing, modern gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its superior chipset and faster charging are ideal for power users. Buy the Blackview BV9800 Pro if you prioritize a proven, reliable rugged design and are on a tighter budget, accepting a noticeable performance compromise for the lower price point.