Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra vs. Power Armor 19T: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers a substantial leap in processing power. However, the Power Armor 19T offers excellent value and respectable performance for everyday tasks and moderate use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 18 | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 177.3 x 85.6 x 33.8 mm (6.98 x 3.37 x 1.33 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 688 g (1.52 lb) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~70.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 900 nits (HBM), 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, Display Port 1.4, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 20% in 10 min 10W reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 21200 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | $ 877.91 / £ 639.99 / € 799.99 | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 112:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra
- Exceptional performance with Dimensity 9300+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Long battery endurance (112:30h)
- Likely higher price point
- Potentially larger and heavier due to flagship components
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- More affordable price
- Wireless charging support
- Good battery life for everyday use
- Significantly lower performance than the 29 Ultra
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
While both devices are ruggedized, display details are limited in the provided data. However, the Armor 29 Ultra’s flagship positioning suggests a higher-quality panel, potentially with higher peak brightness and color accuracy. The 19T, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a more cost-effective display solution. The absence of refresh rate data suggests both may operate at standard 60Hz, but the 29 Ultra could potentially feature LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates and improved power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, but the Armor 29 Ultra’s flagship status implies a more advanced camera system. We can infer a larger main sensor and potentially more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The 19T likely features a more basic camera setup focused on capturing usable images in good lighting conditions. Without specific details, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or video capabilities, but the 29 Ultra is expected to excel in these areas.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra’s MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a unique CPU configuration with Cortex-X4 cores clocked up to 3.4 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Power Armor 19T’s Helio G99 (6nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A76 and A55 cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9300+ offers superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. The 9300+’s architecture will deliver significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, benefiting gamers and power users. The 19T’s Helio G99 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra boasts impressive endurance, rated at 112:30h, and supports 120W wired charging, achieving 20% charge in just 10 minutes. This rapid charging is a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The Power Armor 19T offers 66W wired charging (52% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless charging, providing more flexibility but slower overall charging speeds. While the 19T also offers 5W reverse wireless charging, the 29 Ultra’s 10W reverse charging is slightly faster. The 29 Ultra’s 1000 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra if you need uncompromising performance for demanding applications like mobile gaming, video editing, or running complex field operations software. Its faster charging and longer endurance are ideal for extended deployments. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prioritize affordability and a balanced feature set for everyday use, light gaming, and reliable communication in harsh environments. It’s a practical choice for those who don’t require the absolute latest in processing power.