Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Rugged Performance Deep Dive
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency compared to the aging Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro. While the Cat S62 Pro remains a capable device, it's showing its age.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 18 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 177.3 x 85.6 x 33.8 mm (6.98 x 3.37 x 1.33 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 688 g (1.52 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~70.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 900 nits (HBM), 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, Display Port 1.4, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 20% in 10 min 10W reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 21200 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | $ 877.91 / £ 639.99 / € 799.99 | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 112:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra
- Exceptional performance with the Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Long-lasting battery with 1000 charge cycles
- Potentially higher price point
- Software support longevity is unknown
Cat S62 Pro
- Proven rugged design and durability
- More affordable price
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Slow charging speeds
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided for either device. However, given the Armor 29 Ultra's positioning as a flagship, it likely features a higher resolution and refresh rate panel than the Cat S62 Pro. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The Armor 29 Ultra's newer display technology would translate to a more vibrant and responsive user experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, the Armor 29 Ultra, as a newer flagship, likely features a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing capabilities. The Cat S62 Pro’s camera, while functional, is likely to produce lower-quality images, especially in low-light conditions. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it's safe to assume the Armor 29 Ultra offers a superior photographic experience.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) chipset, with its octa-core configuration (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720), represents a massive leap in processing power compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Dimensity 9300+’s newer architecture and smaller fabrication node (4nm vs 14nm) result in significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, as well as better thermal efficiency. This means the Armor 29 Ultra will handle demanding applications and multitasking with ease, while the S62 Pro will struggle with resource-intensive tasks. The S62 Pro's Kryo 260 cores, while efficient for their time, are simply outmatched.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra boasts impressive battery endurance, rated at 112:30h, and supports 120W wired charging, achieving 20% charge in just 10 minutes. This rapid charging capability is a significant advantage over the Cat S62 Pro, which lacks comparable fast charging technology. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Armor 29 Ultra’s 1000 charge cycle rating suggests a focus on long-term battery health, a crucial feature for rugged devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running complex work applications. Its superior processing power and fast charging are ideal for professionals and power users. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a proven, reliable rugged design and are on a tighter budget, accepting that performance will be considerably slower and less efficient for modern applications.