Ulefone Armor 29 Pro vs. Blackview BV9300: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7400 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power over the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99. However, the BV9300 remains a strong contender for those seeking a more balanced, efficient device at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 29 Pro | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 14 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 177.4 x 85.6 x 33.8 mm (6.98 x 3.37 x 1.33 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 688 g (1.52 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~70.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 20% in 10 min 10W reverse wired | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 21200 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | € 479.99 / $ 459.99 / £ 369.99 | About 390 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 29 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7400)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Likely higher price point
- Potentially shorter battery life if battery capacity is lower
Blackview BV9300
- More power-efficient processor (Helio G99)
- Potentially lower price
- Solid build quality expected from Blackview
- Slower processor compared to the Armor 29 Pro
- Significantly slower charging speed (33W)
Display Comparison
While both phones are ruggedized, display specifics are missing. However, given the Armor 29 Pro’s positioning, we anticipate a higher peak brightness and potentially a higher refresh rate than the BV9300. The BV9300, leveraging the Helio G99, likely focuses on power efficiency in its display implementation. Bezels are expected to be similar, prioritizing durability over ultra-thin designs. Color accuracy will likely be adequate on both, but not flagship-level.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond sensor resolution are absent. However, the Armor 29 Pro’s higher processing power suggests more sophisticated image processing capabilities. The BV9300’s Helio G99 will be adequate for basic photography, but may exhibit slower processing times and less dynamic range in challenging lighting conditions. We expect both phones to include a standard suite of camera modes, but the Armor 29 Pro may offer features like 4K video recording at higher frame rates.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7400’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, deliver significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The 4nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The BV9300’s Helio G99, with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, is still capable, but will struggle to match the Armor 29 Pro in demanding scenarios. The Armor 29 Pro will benefit users who frequently game or use resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Armor 29 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a 20% charge in just 10 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the BV9300’s 33W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Armor 29 Pro’s more efficient chipset could offset a potentially smaller battery size. The BV9300’s 5W reverse wired charging is a niche feature, while the Armor 29 Pro’s 10W reverse charging offers slightly more utility. Users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone will greatly benefit from the Armor 29 Pro’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prioritize battery life, a more conservative thermal profile, and a potentially lower overall cost, making it ideal for everyday use and less intensive workloads.