Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal vs. Power Armor 13: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7400 chipset delivers substantially faster performance than the Helio G95 in the Power Armor 13, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. While the Power Armor 13 offers comparable battery endurance ratings, the 29 Pro's efficiency gains offset the slightly slower charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 14 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 177.4 x 85.6 x 33.8 mm (6.98 x 3.37 x 1.33 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 688 g (1.52 lb) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~70.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm Thermal camera by ThermoVue T2, 640x512 px | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 20% in 10 min 10W reverse wired | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 21200 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | € 789.99 / $ 583.19 | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7400)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- More efficient 4nm process node
- Display specifications largely unknown
- Camera details are lacking
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Long battery endurance (296h rating)
- Wireless charging support
- Established reliability within Ulefone's rugged lineup
- Outdated Helio G95 chipset
- Slow 33W wired charging
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1306:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Armor 29 Pro Thermal’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. The Power Armor 13’s measured peak brightness of 401 nits is adequate for outdoor visibility, but may struggle in direct sunlight. Without knowing the panel technology used in the 29 Pro, it’s impossible to assess potential improvements in color accuracy or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack detailed camera specifications. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a photography powerhouse. The Power Armor 13’s inclusion of a 2MP macro camera is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility, given the small sensor size and limited dynamic range.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Power Armor 13’s Helio G95 (12nm). The Dimensity 7400’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, offer a considerable performance boost over the G95’s 2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The smaller 4nm process node also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, crucial for sustained performance. This means the 29 Pro will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications far more smoothly.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 296 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Armor 29 Pro Thermal’s 120W wired charging is a massive advantage. Ulefone claims a 20% charge in just 10 minutes, drastically reducing downtime. The Power Armor 13’s 33W wired charging, 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless charging are significantly slower. While the Power Armor 13’s wireless charging offers convenience, the 29 Pro’s speed is a compelling benefit for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running specialized field applications. Its faster processor and charging will significantly improve your workflow. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 13 if you prioritize maximum battery life and are primarily focused on basic communication, navigation, and occasional photography, and are less concerned with raw processing power.