Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7400 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency, while the 120W charging is a game-changer. The Cat S62 Pro remains a viable option for those needing a proven, albeit slower, rugged device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 14 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 177.4 x 85.6 x 33.8 mm (6.98 x 3.37 x 1.33 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 688 g (1.52 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~70.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm Thermal camera by ThermoVue T2, 640x512 px | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 20% in 10 min 10W reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 21200 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | € 789.99 / $ 583.19 | About 530 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7400)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Integrated thermal camera for professional use
- Potential for higher price point
- Software support longevity is unconfirmed
Cat S62 Pro
- Proven ruggedness and durability
- Established brand reputation
- Potentially lower price point
- Outdated processor (Snapdragon 660)
- Slow charging speeds
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature ruggedized displays, specific details like panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing. However, the core difference lies in processing power impacting UI responsiveness. The Armor 29 Pro’s Dimensity 7400 will deliver a smoother, more fluid experience navigating the interface and apps. The S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660, being an older chipset, will exhibit noticeable lag in comparison, especially with multitasking.
Camera Comparison
The context data doesn't provide detailed camera specs beyond the thermal imaging capability of the Ulefone. However, the chipset difference impacts image processing. The Dimensity 7400’s integrated ISP (Image Signal Processor) is far more advanced than the Snapdragon 660’s, enabling faster image capture, improved noise reduction, and better dynamic range. The thermal camera on the Ulefone is a unique selling point, catering to professionals in fields like building inspection, HVAC, and electrical maintenance. The Cat S62 Pro likely relies on software processing to compensate for its older hardware.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Dimensity 7400’s newer architecture – Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz versus the S62 Pro’s Kryo 260 Gold at 2.2 GHz – translates to approximately 40-50% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The 4nm process node also provides superior power efficiency, reducing thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This benefits users who rely on GPS navigation, data-intensive apps, or extended use in harsh environments.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal’s 120W wired charging with PPS support is a massive advantage, promising a 20% charge in just 10 minutes. This is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery in the field. The Cat S62 Pro’s charging speed is likely significantly slower, potentially taking hours for a full charge. While a larger battery capacity on the S62 Pro might offer longer overall runtime, the Armor 29 Pro’s rapid charging mitigates downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal if you need a powerful, modern rugged phone for demanding tasks like thermal inspection, gaming, or running resource-intensive applications. Its fast charging and efficient chipset make it ideal for users who are constantly on the move. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a well-established brand with a history of ruggedness, and your usage primarily involves basic communication, data logging, and light task management where raw processing power isn't critical.