Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and superior efficiency. While the Cat S62 Pro remains a capable device, its aging hardware struggles to compete with the Ultra's modern capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 17 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 174.2 x 83.6 x 19.4 mm (6.86 x 3.29 x 0.76 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 450 g (0.99 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (HBM), 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, Display Port 1.4, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 40% in 10 min 50W wireless, 35% in 30 min 10W reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 10600 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | $ 749.99 / C$ 1,399.99 / € 799.99 | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 112:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
- Exceptional performance with the Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Long-lasting battery life (112:30h endurance)
- Potentially higher price point
- Software support longevity is unknown
Cat S62 Pro
- Proven rugged design and durability
- More affordable price point
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but given the Armor 28 Ultra's positioning, we can expect a modern panel with a high refresh rate. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, likely features a standard 60Hz LCD. The Dimensity 9300+'s integrated display engine supports advanced features like variable refresh rate (VRR) for smoother visuals and improved power efficiency, features the Snapdragon 660 lacks. The Armor 28 Ultra will likely have a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the chipset difference implies a significant advantage for the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra. The Dimensity 9300+ includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) capable of handling higher resolution sensors and more complex image processing algorithms. While the Cat S62 Pro may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, the Armor 28 Ultra will likely excel in low-light scenarios and offer more advanced features like 8K video recording and improved dynamic range. We can assume the Armor 28 Ultra will have a more modern camera system overall.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) chipset, with its octa-core configuration (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720), represents a massive leap over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Dimensity 9300+ utilizes newer CPU core designs (Cortex-X4) and a smaller manufacturing process, resulting in significantly higher processing speeds and improved power efficiency. The Snapdragon 660, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications and multitasking. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 9300+ also translates to less heat generation under load, minimizing performance throttling.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra boasts impressive battery endurance, rated at 112:30h, and supports incredibly fast 120W wired charging (40% in 10 minutes) and 50W wireless charging (35% in 30 minutes). The Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but its older chipset and lack of fast charging technology will result in significantly shorter battery life and longer charging times. The 10W reverse wired charging on the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra is also a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra if you need a smartphone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running complex applications while maintaining exceptional battery life and benefiting from the latest connectivity standards. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a proven, reliable rugged design and are comfortable with a more basic user experience, and your workload doesn't require significant processing power.