Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra vs. Blackview BV9200: A Rugged Smartphone Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers a generational leap in processing power. However, the Blackview BV9200 remains a compelling option for those seeking a capable rugged phone at a significantly lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 17 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 174.2 x 83.6 x 19.4 mm (6.86 x 3.29 x 0.76 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 450 g (0.99 lb) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (HBM), 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, Display Port 1.4, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 40% in 10 min 50W wireless, 35% in 30 min 10W reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 10600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | $ 749.99 / C$ 1,399.99 / € 799.99 | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 112:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
- Flagship Dimensity 9300+ performance
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Long battery endurance (112:30h)
- Higher price point
- Display specifications currently unknown
Blackview BV9200
- More affordable price
- Respectable 481 nits brightness
- Durable rugged design
- Helio G96 chipset is less powerful
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 provides a measured 481 nits of maximum brightness, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility, and a 1423:1 contrast ratio. However, the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult. Given the Armor 28 Ultra’s premium positioning, we anticipate a higher peak brightness and potentially a more advanced panel technology like LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, improving both visual quality and power efficiency. The BV9200’s contrast ratio suggests an IPS panel, while the Ulefone may employ AMOLED for richer colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications beyond the main sensors are unavailable for the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra. The Blackview BV9200’s camera details are also limited, but the focus should be on the primary sensor’s capabilities. While both phones likely include multiple lenses, the image processing capabilities of the Dimensity 9300+ in the Ulefone will likely provide superior image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The Armor 28 Ultra’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will be far more advanced, enabling features like better noise reduction and HDR processing.
Performance
The performance disparity is substantial. The Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) chipset, with its octa-core configuration (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720), represents a significant architectural upgrade over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 9300+ utilizes newer Cortex-X4 cores, offering superior single-core and multi-core performance. The 4nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The BV9200’s Helio G96 (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games or applications. The Armor 28 Ultra is designed for power users.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra boasts impressive charging capabilities: 120W wired (40% in 10 minutes), 50W wireless (35% in 30 minutes), and 10W reverse wired. The Blackview BV9200 offers 66W wired and 30W wireless charging. While the Ulefone’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 112:30h endurance rating suggests a large battery optimized for extended use. The faster charging speeds of the Ulefone significantly reduce downtime, while the 1000 charge cycle rating indicates long-term battery health. The BV9200’s charging is slower, but still respectable for its price range.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra if you demand flagship-level performance for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running complex applications in the field. Its 120W charging and advanced chipset justify the higher price. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you need a reliable, durable smartphone for basic communication, navigation, and light usage, and are prioritizing affordability over top-tier specifications.