Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal vs Blackview BV9300: A Rugged Performance Divide
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ offers a substantial performance leap over the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99. However, the BV9300 remains a compelling choice for those seeking a capable rugged phone at a significantly lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 03 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 17 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 174.2 x 83.6 x 19.4 mm (6.86 x 3.29 x 0.76 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 450 g (0.99 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~75.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 900 nits (HBM), 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm Thermal camera by ThermoVue T2, 640x512 px | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, Display Port 1.4, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 40% in 10 min 50W wireless, 35% in 30 min 10W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 10600 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | $ 899.80 | About 390 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal
- Flagship-level performance with Dimensity 9300+
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Integrated thermal imaging camera
- Advanced ISP for superior image processing
- Higher price point
- Potentially larger and heavier due to advanced features
Blackview BV9300
- Excellent value for money
- Good battery life with efficient Helio G99
- Robust and durable rugged design
- More affordable replacement cost
- Significantly slower charging speeds
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature durable displays befitting their rugged nature, the context data doesn't provide specifics. However, the chipset difference suggests a potential disparity in display capabilities. The Dimensity 9300+ can drive higher resolution and refresh rate panels, hinting at a potentially sharper and smoother experience on the Ulefone. The Blackview, with its Helio G99, will likely focus on efficiency, potentially sacrificing peak brightness or refresh rate to conserve battery.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn't detail camera specs beyond the chipsets. However, the Dimensity 9300+'s advanced ISP (Image Signal Processor) will enable more sophisticated image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The Blackview, while capable, will be limited by the Helio G99’s ISP. The thermal imaging capability of the Ulefone is a unique feature not present in the BV9300, catering to professionals in fields like building inspection or search and rescue.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) is in a different league than the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 9300+ features a unique CPU core configuration – 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – designed for peak performance and AI tasks. The Helio G99’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration is geared towards efficiency. This translates to significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the Ulefone. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9300+ also provides better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal boasts impressive charging speeds: 120W wired (40% in 10 minutes), 50W wireless (35% in 30 minutes), and both wired and wireless reverse charging. The Blackview BV9300 lags behind with only 33W wired charging and 5W reverse wired. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Ulefone mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Ulefone’s wireless charging is a significant convenience feature absent in the BV9300.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or thermal imaging, and are willing to pay a premium. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prioritize value, long battery life for everyday use, and a robust build quality without the flagship price tag. The BV9300 is ideal for construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts on a budget, or anyone needing a reliable secondary device.