Ulefone Armor 28 Pro vs. Infinix GT 10 Pro: A Deep Dive into Ruggedness and Gaming Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing longevity and resilience, the Ulefone Armor 28 Pro is the clear winner. Its exceptional battery endurance and rugged build quality outweigh the Infinix GT 10 Pro’s slightly faster processor. However, gamers seeking a more visually vibrant experience may lean towards the Infinix.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 28 Pro | Infinix GT 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2023, August 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 12 | Available. Released 2023, August 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 174.2 x 83.6 x 19.4 mm (6.86 x 3.29 x 0.76 in) | 162.7 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 450 g (0.99 lb) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, up to 1 major Android upgrades, XOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 40% in 10 min 50W wireless, 35% in 30 min 10W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless | 45W wired, PD3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 10600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Cyber Black, Mirage Silver |
| Models | - | X6739 |
| Price | $ 399.99 / € 492.56 | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 111:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 28 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (111:30h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Ruggedized design for extreme durability
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera system
Infinix GT 10 Pro
- Brighter display (701 nits)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- More aesthetically pleasing design
- Shorter battery life
- Slower charging speeds (45W)
- Less durable build quality
Display Comparison
The Infinix GT 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 701 nits, offering a more vivid visual experience in direct sunlight compared to the Ulefone Armor 28 Pro, which lacks published brightness data. While the Ulefone’s display is likely adequate, the GT 10 Pro’s higher brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. The Armor 28 Pro’s ruggedized design likely necessitates a thicker glass cover, potentially impacting clarity, while the GT 10 Pro’s focus on aesthetics suggests a more refined display experience. We expect the GT 10 Pro to have better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are lacking for both devices, but we can infer some differences. The Infinix GT 10 Pro’s marketing emphasizes its camera capabilities, suggesting a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. The Ulefone Armor 28 Pro, geared towards practicality, likely prioritizes a durable camera module over cutting-edge features. Without sensor size data, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the GT 10 Pro’s positioning suggests a greater investment in camera quality. We can expect the GT 10 Pro to have better low-light performance and more versatile shooting modes.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek Dimensity chipsets, but differ significantly in their implementation. The Infinix GT 10 Pro’s Dimensity 8050 (6nm) features a single high-clocked Cortex-A78 core at 3.0 GHz, alongside three additional A78 cores at 2.6 GHz, and four efficiency cores. The Ulefone Armor 28 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm) employs a different core configuration: four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.5 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7300 should offer superior power efficiency, potentially offsetting the 8050’s higher clock speeds. The GT 10 Pro’s core configuration suggests a stronger focus on burst performance, while the 7300 prioritizes sustained performance and efficiency. The GT 10 Pro will likely have a slight edge in raw gaming benchmarks, but the Armor 28 Pro should maintain performance for longer periods.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 28 Pro truly shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 111:30h rating and a 10,000mAh capacity. This is coupled with incredibly fast 120W wired charging (40% in 10 minutes) and 50W wireless charging (35% in 30 minutes). The Infinix GT 10 Pro, with an older 112h endurance rating, likely has a smaller battery capacity and relies on a slower 45W wired charging solution. The Armor 28 Pro’s reverse charging capabilities (10W wired, 5W wireless) further enhance its utility. The Ulefone’s 1000 charge cycle rating also suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 28 Pro if you need a phone that can withstand harsh environments, offers multi-day battery life, and provides peace of mind against accidental damage. Buy the Infinix GT 10 Pro if you prioritize a brighter display for media consumption, enjoy mobile gaming, and prefer a more conventional smartphone design.