Ulefone Armor 28 Pro vs. Blackview BV9300: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Ulefone Armor 28 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power over the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99. However, the BV9300 remains a compelling option for those seeking a more affordable and energy-efficient rugged device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 28 Pro | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 12 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 174.2 x 83.6 x 19.4 mm (6.86 x 3.29 x 0.76 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 450 g (0.99 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 40% in 10 min 50W wireless, 35% in 30 min 10W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 10600 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | $ 399.99 / € 492.56 | About 390 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 111:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 28 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300)
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potentially superior camera image processing
- Likely higher price point
- Potentially higher power consumption under heavy load
Blackview BV9300
- More affordable price
- Potentially better battery life due to efficient chipset
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor (Helio G99)
- Significantly slower charging speed (33W)
- Limited image processing capabilities
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing, both phones target the rugged market, suggesting durable glass like Gorilla Glass. The key difference lies beneath the surface. The Armor 28 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 likely supports higher refresh rates and more advanced display features. The BV9300, with its Helio G99, will likely offer a standard 60Hz or 90Hz panel. The Armor 28 Pro’s more powerful GPU will also translate to smoother graphics rendering on the display.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, but given the market segment, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup. However, the Armor 28 Pro’s superior processing power from the Dimensity 7300 will enable more advanced image processing algorithms, resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The BV9300’s Helio G99 will be limited in its ability to handle complex image processing tasks. Expect the Armor 28 Pro to excel in low-light photography and video recording.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 28 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, significantly outperform the BV9300’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 also offers superior power efficiency, potentially mitigating the performance gap under sustained loads. The BV9300’s Helio G99 is still capable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 28 Pro boasts impressive charging capabilities: 120W wired (40% in 10 minutes), 50W wireless (35% in 30 minutes), and reverse charging options. The Blackview BV9300 is limited to 33W wired charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Armor 28 Pro’s 111:30h endurance suggests a large battery coupled with efficient power management. The faster charging speeds of the Armor 28 Pro are a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The BV9300’s slower charging will require more downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 28 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prioritize battery life, a lower price point, and are content with a more modest level of processing power for everyday tasks and light gaming.