Ulefone Armor 27T vs. Power Armor 19T: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T is the superior choice. Its 66W wired charging, capable of a 52% charge in just 30 minutes, dramatically reduces downtime compared to the 27T’s 33W charging. While the 27T boasts impressive battery endurance, the convenience of faster charging outweighs that benefit for the average user.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 27T | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 182.8 x 86.8 x 18.5 mm (7.20 x 3.42 x 0.73 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 441 g (15.56 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights Thermal camera by Flir, 80x60 px, 9Hz, 17μm | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 112:15h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 27T
- Exceptional 112-hour battery endurance
- 1000 charge cycle battery lifespan for long-term reliability
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging capabilities
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Potentially longer downtime between charges
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Significantly faster 66W wired charging (52% in 30 min)
- Convenient quick charging for minimal downtime
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging capabilities
- Potentially shorter overall battery endurance compared to the 27T
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature similar LCD panels, typical for this price segment. Detailed display specs (resolution, brightness, color gamut) are not provided, but the focus here is on ruggedness, not display fidelity. Expect adequate outdoor visibility, but not flagship-level color accuracy. Bezels are likely to be substantial, prioritizing drop protection over a sleek aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the provided data doesn't highlight any significant differences in sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS). The focus is on functionality rather than photographic excellence. Expect acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but performance will likely degrade in low-light scenarios. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors are unlikely to contribute meaningfully to image quality.
Performance
Both the Armor 27T and Power Armor 19T are powered by the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm). This chipset features an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Performance will be nearly identical for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The 6nm process node offers a good balance of power efficiency and performance, but neither device will compete with flagship-level processors. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X is likely, impacting multitasking performance less than the CPU.
Battery Life
This is where the key difference lies. The Ulefone Armor 27T boasts an impressive 112-hour endurance rating and a 1000-cycle battery lifespan, suggesting a focus on long-term reliability and extended use between charges. However, it’s limited to 33W wired charging, 30W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless. The Power Armor 19T, while potentially having a slightly smaller battery (not specified), compensates with a significantly faster 66W wired charging capability, achieving a 52% charge in just 30 minutes. It also offers 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless. The 19T’s faster charging is a substantial advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 27T if you prioritize maximum battery longevity and frequently find yourself without access to a power outlet for extended periods. Its 112-hour endurance and 1000 charge cycles offer peace of mind for long-term reliability. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you value convenience and need to quickly top up your battery. The 66W charging is a game-changer for users who need to minimize downtime and appreciate a faster return to full power.