Ulefone Armor 27T vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and extended battery life, the Ulefone Armor 27T emerges as the winner. Its Helio G99 chipset and superior battery endurance significantly outperform the Nokia XR20’s Snapdragon 480. However, the Nokia XR20 remains a solid choice for those valuing 5G connectivity and a cleaner software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 27T | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 182.8 x 86.8 x 18.5 mm (7.20 x 3.42 x 0.73 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 441 g (15.56 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights Thermal camera by Flir, 80x60 px, 9Hz, 17μm | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 112:15h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 27T
- Superior processing power with the Mediatek Helio G99.
- Exceptional battery life (112:15h endurance).
- Faster charging speeds (33W wired, 30W wireless).
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
- Details on display quality are missing.
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.
- Nokia’s reputation for software updates and support.
- Rugged design for durability.
- Slower processor (Snapdragon 480).
- Slower charging speeds (18W wired, 15W wireless).
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type, resolution, and refresh rate are missing, but the focus here is durability. The absence of specifics suggests both prioritize ruggedness over visual fidelity. However, the chipset differences *could* impact UI smoothness; the G99’s greater processing power in the Ulefone may translate to a more responsive experience, even with a similar panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the processing capabilities of the Helio G99 in the Ulefone Armor 27T suggest it will handle image processing more efficiently, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and detail in photos and videos. The Nokia XR20’s Snapdragon 480 ISP is adequate, but likely won’t match the G99’s capabilities. The absence of information on sensor sizes and lens apertures makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the chipset advantage leans towards the Ulefone.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 27T’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a significant advantage over the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The G99’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 vs 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460) will deliver noticeably faster performance in applications and gaming. The 6nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Snapdragon 480 offers 5G connectivity, the G99’s raw CPU and GPU power will likely provide a smoother overall user experience.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 27T’s battery endurance of 112:15h is a standout feature, significantly exceeding what’s typically expected from a rugged phone. Coupled with 33W wired charging, 30W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless, it offers exceptional versatility. The Nokia XR20’s 18W wired and 15W wireless charging are comparatively slower. While the XR20’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Ulefone’s endurance rating suggests a substantial difference in real-world usage, making it ideal for users who spend extended periods away from power outlets. The 1000 charge cycle rating on the Ulefone also indicates a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 27T if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like outdoor work, gaming, or extended trips where charging isn't readily available. Its longer battery life and more powerful processor will be invaluable. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a more mainstream smartphone experience with 5G connectivity, guaranteed software updates, and a focus on reliable everyday performance, even if it means sacrificing some raw power and battery longevity.