Ulefone Armor 27T vs. Doogee S96 GT: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Ulefone Armor 27T emerges as the winner. Its Helio G99 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, coupled with its exceptional 112-hour battery endurance, provides a significant advantage over the Doogee S96 GT’s older, less efficient Helio G95.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 27T | Doogee S96 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 182.8 x 86.8 x 18.5 mm (7.20 x 3.42 x 0.73 in) | 167 x 81.4 x 15.5 mm (6.57 x 3.20 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 441 g (15.56 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~71.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights Thermal camera by Flir, 80x60 px, 9Hz, 17μm | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | Yes | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 24W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | 6350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Gold |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 112:15h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 27T
- Superior battery life (112h endurance)
- More efficient chipset (Helio G99, 6nm)
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Slower wired charging than the Doogee S96 GT
- Limited display specifications available
Doogee S96 GT
- Faster wired charging (24W)
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- Potentially lower price point (market dependent)
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G95, 12nm)
- Shorter battery life compared to Ulefone
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged nature of both phones, we can assume both utilize durable, scratch-resistant panels. The absence of details like refresh rate or resolution suggests a focus on practicality over premium visual experiences. Users should expect adequate, but not exceptional, display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the focus for rugged phones is often on durability and practicality rather than cutting-edge camera technology. Users should expect competent, but not flagship-level, image quality. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests both phones likely rely on software processing to enhance image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to its small sensor size and low resolution.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 27T’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a clear architectural advantage over the Doogee S96 GT’s Helio G95 (12nm). The smaller 6nm node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially reduced throttling under sustained load. While both CPUs feature the same core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), the G99’s superior process node gives it an edge in real-world performance, particularly in gaming and multitasking. The G95, while capable, will likely exhibit more thermal limitations during prolonged intensive use.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 27T’s battery endurance of 112 hours is a standout feature, significantly exceeding what’s typically found in smartphones. This is coupled with a 1000 cycle lifespan, promising long-term battery health. The Doogee S96 GT, while offering 24W wired and 15W wireless charging, cannot match the 27T’s longevity. The 33W wired and 30W wireless charging on the Ulefone, combined with 5W reverse wireless charging, provides greater flexibility. The G99’s efficiency further contributes to the 27T’s superior battery performance, meaning users will spend less time tethered to a charger.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 27T if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and you value a more modern chipset for sustained performance during demanding tasks. Buy the Doogee S96 GT if you prioritize faster charging and are willing to trade some battery life and processing efficiency for quicker top-ups, and are less concerned with extended heavy usage.