Ulefone Armor 27T Pro vs. Oukitel WP210: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and all-day (and beyond) battery life, the Oukitel WP210 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset delivers significantly more processing power, while 45W charging mitigates the slightly smaller battery capacity. However, the Ulefone Armor 27T Pro is a strong contender for those who absolutely need maximum endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | Oukitel WP210 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 2, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 01 | 2025, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 01 | Available. Released 2025, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 182.8 x 86.8 x 18.5 mm (7.20 x 3.42 x 0.73 in) | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 441 g (15.56 oz) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights Thermal camera by FLIR, 80x60 px, 9Hz, 17μm | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless | 45W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Po 8800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Gray, Black, Red |
| Price | About 480 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 113:36h endurance, 1000 cycles | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class A | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (113:36h)
- 1000 charge cycle lifespan
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 6300)
- Slower charging speeds (33W wired, 30W wireless)
Oukitel WP210
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8200)
- Faster charging (45W wired)
- More efficient 4nm process
- Shorter battery endurance (86:17h)
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
While both devices are rugged, display specifics are absent in the provided data. However, given the WP210's focus on performance, it's reasonable to expect a higher refresh rate panel. The Armor 27T Pro likely prioritizes power efficiency, potentially utilizing a lower refresh rate to conserve battery. The absence of details like peak brightness or panel type makes a direct comparison impossible, but the WP210's positioning suggests a more visually engaging experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, the WP210’s overall performance focus suggests a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 8200, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The Armor 27T Pro likely focuses on reliable image capture, but may lack the advanced features found in the WP210. The absence of information regarding OIS or main sensor size prevents a definitive conclusion.
Performance
The Oukitel WP210’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in processing power compared to the Ulefone Armor 27T Pro’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The WP210’s CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is geared towards demanding applications. The Armor 27T Pro’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 is more focused on efficiency. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8200 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during prolonged intensive use. This benefits gamers and power users.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 27T Pro boasts a significantly longer battery endurance of 113:36h compared to the Oukitel WP210’s 86:17h. This is a key differentiator for users prioritizing longevity. However, the WP210 compensates with faster 45W wired charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Armor 27T Pro’s 33W wired and 30W wireless charging are respectable, but slower. The inclusion of reverse wireless charging on the Armor 27T Pro is a bonus for charging accessories, but the WP210’s faster charging speeds are more impactful for daily use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 27T Pro if you need unparalleled battery endurance for multi-day trips or work in remote locations where charging isn't readily available. Its 113:36h endurance and 1000 charge cycles offer peace of mind. Buy the Oukitel WP210 if you prioritize responsiveness for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and value faster charging to quickly top up the battery.