Ulefone Armor 27T Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and battery longevity, the Ulefone Armor 27T Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset offers a significant generational leap over the Snapdragon 660, translating to smoother multitasking and improved efficiency. While the Cat S62 Pro remains a capable device, its age shows in its processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 2, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 01 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 01 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 182.8 x 86.8 x 18.5 mm (7.20 x 3.42 x 0.73 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 441 g (15.56 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights Thermal camera by FLIR, 80x60 px, 9Hz, 17μm | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless | - |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 113:36h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 6300)
- Superior battery life (113:36h endurance)
- Faster charging (33W wired, 30W wireless, reverse wireless)
- Potential software support concerns (Ulefone's track record)
- Rugged design may feel bulky
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation for ruggedness (CAT)
- Potential for enterprise support and integration
- Durable build quality
- Outdated processor (Snapdragon 660)
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely shorter battery life
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the market segment, both devices likely feature LCD panels optimized for outdoor visibility. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, may have lower peak brightness and color accuracy. The Ulefone Armor 27T Pro, benefiting from newer display technology, likely offers a more vibrant and readable experience, though this is speculative without specific nit ratings. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both due to the ruggedized design.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, the focus should be on real-world image quality rather than megapixel counts. Given the rugged nature of these phones, image processing will likely prioritize clarity and dynamic range in challenging lighting conditions. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to definitively say which phone has the better camera, but newer chipsets generally offer improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, giving the Ulefone Armor 27T Pro a potential edge. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Armor 27T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning less throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.4 GHz) also offer a performance advantage over the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores (4x2.2 GHz). This will be noticeable in app loading times, multitasking, and overall system responsiveness. The Ulefone will handle modern applications and games with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 27T Pro boasts impressive battery endurance, rated at 113:36h. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery life isn’t specified, the older Snapdragon 660 is less power-efficient. The Ulefone also offers faster charging with 33W wired and 30W wireless, alongside reverse wireless charging – features absent in the Cat S62 Pro. This combination of longevity and charging speed makes the Ulefone significantly more convenient for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day. The 1000 charge cycle rating on the Ulefone also suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 27T Pro if you need a rugged phone with modern processing power for demanding applications, extended battery life, and the convenience of wireless charging. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a proven track record of durability, potentially benefit from existing enterprise support infrastructure, and don't require the latest in chipset technology.