Ulefone Armor 27 vs. Power Armor 19T: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T is the superior choice. Its 66W wired charging, capable of a 52% charge in just 30 minutes, dramatically reduces downtime compared to the Armor 27’s 33W charging. While the Armor 27 boasts impressive 112:15h endurance, the 19T’s faster charging mitigates the endurance gap for all but the most extreme use cases.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 27 | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 182.8 x 86.8 x 18.5 mm (7.20 x 3.42 x 0.73 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 441 g (15.56 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 112:15h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 27
- Exceptional battery endurance (112:15h)
- Long-lasting battery with 1000 charge cycles
- Wireless charging support
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Missing detailed camera specifications
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Ultra-fast 66W wired charging (52% in 30 min)
- Wireless charging support
- Potentially more convenient for frequent users
- Potentially shorter overall battery life compared to Armor 27
- Missing detailed camera specifications
Display Comparison
Both devices share the same Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, meaning display differences won't impact performance. However, detailed display specs (resolution, panel type, brightness) are missing. Given Ulefone’s positioning, we can expect both to utilize IPS LCD panels, prioritizing durability over OLED’s vibrancy. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely similar, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within a ruggedized frame.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, making a direct comparison impossible. However, Ulefone typically equips its rugged phones with capable main sensors. The absence of details suggests neither phone will feature a flagship-level camera system. We can assume both will include multiple lenses, but the quality of the secondary sensors (ultrawide, macro) is likely to be modest. Image processing will likely focus on enhancing clarity and dynamic range in challenging outdoor conditions.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Armor 27 and Power Armor 19T are powered by the Mediatek Helio G99, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This chipset is well-suited for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Thermal management will be crucial; the rugged design may limit passive cooling. The lack of information on RAM type (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR5) and storage speed (UFS 2.2 vs UFS 3.1) prevents a deeper performance analysis, but the G99 is the primary bottleneck, not RAM or storage.
Battery Life
This is where the key difference lies. The Ulefone Armor 27 boasts an impressive 112:15h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. This is coupled with a 1000-cycle battery lifespan, promising long-term reliability. However, it’s limited to 33W wired charging. The Power Armor 19T, while potentially having a slightly smaller battery (spec missing), compensates with a significantly faster 66W wired charging capability, achieving 52% charge in just 30 minutes. Both offer 5W reverse wireless charging, useful for topping up accessories, and 30W/15W wireless charging respectively. The 19T’s charging speed is a clear advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 27 if you prioritize maximum battery longevity and frequently find yourself without access to a power source for extended periods. Its 1000-cycle battery promises long-term reliability. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you value quick charging and need to minimize downtime, especially if you work in environments where frequent top-ups are possible. The 66W charging is a game-changer for productivity.