Ulefone Armor 27 Pro vs. Blackview BL8800 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and sustained use, the Ulefone Armor 27 Pro emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer battery endurance (113:36h) and newer Dimensity 6300 chipset offer a more future-proof experience, despite the Blackview BL8800 Pro's quicker initial charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 27 Pro | Blackview BL8800 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 2, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 01 | 2022, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 01 | Available. Released 2022, May 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 182.8 x 86.8 x 18.5 mm (7.20 x 3.42 x 0.73 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 441 g (15.56 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, thermal assisted camera FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 2x Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 113:36h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor 27 Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (113:36h)
- More efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset (6nm)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Display specifications unknown
- Camera details limited
Blackview BL8800 Pro
- Fast 33W wired charging (100% in 90 minutes)
- Proven performance with Dimensity 700
- Reverse wired charging
- Established software optimization
- Shorter battery life compared to Armor 27 Pro
- Older 7nm chipset less power efficient
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 27 Pro's focus on modern features, it likely incorporates a higher-quality panel with improved color accuracy. The BL8800 Pro, being an older model, may exhibit slightly lower peak brightness and potentially wider bezels. Both devices will likely prioritize durability over display finesse, opting for scratch-resistant glass.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, the focus should be on the main sensor capabilities. Without specific sensor sizes, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner. The Blackview BL8800 Pro likely benefits from a more mature image processing pipeline due to its longer market presence. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for capturing stable photos and videos in challenging conditions. We can assume both phones will include a suite of standard camera modes, but image quality will ultimately depend on sensor size and software optimization.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 27 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Blackview BL8800 Pro's Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency. While both CPUs share the same core configuration (2x2.4/2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), the Dimensity 6300's newer architecture translates to better sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling under heavy loads. This benefits users engaged in prolonged gaming or video editing.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 27 Pro's battery endurance of 113:36h is a standout feature, dwarfing what we'd expect from a phone with similar capacity. This suggests aggressive power management and the efficiency gains of the Dimensity 6300 chipset. The Blackview BL8800 Pro offers 33W wired charging, achieving 31% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes – a respectable speed. However, the Armor 27 Pro counters with both 33W wired *and* 30W wireless charging, plus reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. The Armor 27 Pro's 1000 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 27 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if you value a more efficient processor for sustained tasks. This is the phone for outdoor professionals, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Blackview BL8800 Pro if you prioritize faster initial charging times and are comfortable topping up your phone more frequently. It's a strong choice for users who need a reliable rugged phone with a proven track record and don't mind sacrificing some ultimate battery endurance.