Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra vs. Power Armor 19T: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8020 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds. However, the Power Armor 19T offers excellent value for those needing a reliable, durable phone without the flagship price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179 x 83 x 25.5 mm (7.05 x 3.27 x 1.00 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 609 g (1.34 lb) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 200 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF 8 MP, (telephoto), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 33W wireless (via docking station with pins) Reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 15600 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | € 442.99 / $ 371.99 | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 151:31h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8020)
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Faster wireless charging (33W with dock)
- Likely higher price point
- Potentially more heat generation under sustained load
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- More affordable price
- Good battery life due to efficient chipset
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor (Helio G99)
- Slower charging speeds (66W wired, 15W wireless)
Display Comparison
While both devices are likely to feature durable displays given Ulefone's focus, specific details like panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing. However, the core difference lies in performance. The Armor 26 Ultra’s Dimensity 8020 will drive a smoother user experience, especially when paired with a higher refresh rate display (assumed, but not specified).
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Armor 26 Ultra’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 8020 will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The ability to handle higher resolution sensors and faster frame rates is also enhanced. The Power Armor 19T will still offer acceptable image quality for everyday use, but won’t match the potential of the 26 Ultra.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Armor 26 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm) utilizes a more modern architecture – Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz – compared to the Power Armor 19T’s Helio G99 (6nm) with its Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a significant advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Dimensity 8020’s superior GPU will also deliver a smoother gaming experience. While both chipsets are 6nm, the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 8020 provide a clear edge.
Battery Life
The Armor 26 Ultra boasts an impressive 151:31h endurance rating, suggesting excellent battery optimization despite its focus on performance. Its 120W wired charging is a game-changer, offering significantly faster top-ups compared to the Power Armor 19T’s 66W charging (52% in 30 minutes). The 33W wireless charging (via docking station) is also a substantial upgrade over the 19T’s 15W wireless charging. While the 19T’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its lower power consumption chipset will contribute to good battery life, but the 26 Ultra’s faster charging and potentially larger capacity provide a more convenient experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. Its superior processing power and faster charging will be invaluable. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prioritize affordability and long-term battery life for everyday use, such as communication, navigation, and basic photography. It’s ideal for professionals in fields like construction or outdoor work who need a dependable device without breaking the bank.