Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra vs. Blackview BV9200: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8020 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the BV9200 remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers who don't require top-tier performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179 x 83 x 25.5 mm (7.05 x 3.27 x 1.00 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 609 g (1.34 lb) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 200 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF 8 MP, (telephoto), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 33W wireless (via docking station with pins) Reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 15600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | € 442.99 / $ 371.99 | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 151:31h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8020)
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- 33W wireless charging support
- Price likely to be higher
- Display specifications currently unknown
Blackview BV9200
- More affordable price point
- Solid build quality typical of Blackview
- Usable display brightness (481 nits)
- Slower processor (Helio G96)
- Slower charging speeds (66W wired, 30W wireless)
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 provides a measured 481 nits of peak brightness and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, offering a usable outdoor viewing experience. However, the Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult. Given Ulefone’s recent focus on display quality in other models, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable or superior panel. The BV9200’s contrast ratio suggests an IPS panel, while the Armor 26 Ultra may incorporate newer technologies for improved color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications beyond the main sensors are not provided for either device. However, the focus should be on the primary sensor capabilities. While both phones likely feature multiple lenses, the image processing capabilities of the Dimensity 8020 in the Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The BV9200’s Helio G96 ISP is less capable, potentially leading to softer images and less dynamic range. The absence of detailed camera specs makes a definitive assessment challenging, but the chipset advantage favors the Ulefone.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm) chipset represents a significant upgrade over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 8020’s octa-core configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) delivers substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. The 6nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The BV9200’s Helio G96 (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications. The Armor 26 Ultra is the clear choice for power users.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra boasts 120W wired charging, a game-changer for quickly topping up the battery. While the exact battery capacity is not specified, the 120W charging allows for significantly faster 0-100% charge times compared to the Blackview BV9200’s 66W charging. The Ulefone also offers 33W wireless charging via a docking station, a feature absent on the BV9200. The Armor 26 Ultra’s claimed 151:31h endurance suggests a large battery capacity, potentially offsetting any differences in raw mAh with optimized power management. The BV9200’s 30W wireless charging is slower, but still a convenient option.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 26 Ultra if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or running demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize a lower price point and are content with a more modest level of performance suitable for everyday tasks and light gaming. The BV9200 is a good choice for those who need a durable phone without breaking the bank.