Ulefone Armor 25T Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 25T Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power and efficiency over the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660, translating to smoother multitasking and better gaming. However, the Cat S62 Pro remains a viable option for those seeking a well-established brand with a focus on specific enterprise features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 25T Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 177.4 x 81.4 x 12.5 mm (6.98 x 3.20 x 0.49 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 326 g (11.50 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~75.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights Thermal camera by ThermoVue, 160x120 px, 25Hz, 12μm | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless | - |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 25T Pro
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 6300
- More efficient 6nm process for better battery life
- Faster 33W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Long-term software support is uncertain
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand with a history in rugged devices
- Potential for enterprise support and software updates
- Proven reliability of the Snapdragon 660 platform
- Familiar user experience for Qualcomm users
- Older and less powerful Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Less efficient 14nm process
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely lower display quality
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 25T Pro's newer chipset and likely target market, it's reasonable to expect a higher resolution and potentially a higher refresh rate display than the Cat S62 Pro. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The Armor 25T Pro may incorporate features like higher peak brightness for outdoor visibility, a crucial aspect for a rugged device.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a detailed comparison is challenging. However, the age difference suggests the Ulefone Armor 25T Pro likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Cat S62 Pro, while capable, will likely struggle in low-light conditions compared to a newer device. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and offers limited practical benefit. Focus should be on the main sensor's megapixel count and aperture.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Armor 25T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a significant generational leap over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, meaning the Ulefone will likely run cooler and deliver longer battery life under load. The Dimensity 6300’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a performance advantage over the Snapdragon 660’s 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver. This translates to faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. Gamers will particularly benefit from the Dimensity 6300’s more capable GPU.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Ulefone Armor 25T Pro’s 33W wired and 30W wireless charging capabilities are a clear advantage over the Cat S62 Pro, which likely offers slower charging speeds. The addition of reverse wireless charging on the Ulefone is a convenient feature for topping up accessories. While a larger battery capacity is always desirable, the Dimensity 6300’s superior power efficiency means the Ulefone can potentially achieve comparable or even better battery life with a smaller battery pack.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 25T Pro if you need a rugged phone with modern processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if fast charging (both wired and wireless) is a priority. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a phone from a brand with a long history in the rugged space, potentially benefiting from enterprise support and a more conservative software approach, and if your workload is primarily focused on basic communication and utility apps.