Ulefone Armor 24 vs. Oukitel WP210: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP210 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power, despite a shorter battery endurance. However, users who absolutely require maximum uptime and are less concerned with intensive tasks will find the Ulefone Armor 24 a more suitable choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 24 | Oukitel WP210 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September | 2025, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2025, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 181.2 x 87 x 27.5 mm (7.13 x 3.43 x 1.08 in) | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 647 g (1.43 lb) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~69.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 45W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 22000 mAh | Li-Po 8800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Gray, Black, Red |
| Price | About 370 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 1000 cycles | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class A | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class B | Class C |
Ulefone Armor 24
- Exceptional battery life (166:39h endurance)
- 66W fast charging
- Rugged build quality for demanding environments
- Older and less powerful Helio G96 chipset
- Potentially slower app loading and multitasking
Oukitel WP210
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset for smooth performance
- 4nm process for improved efficiency
- Faster overall charging experience despite lower wattage
- Shorter battery life (86:17h endurance)
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
While both phones are rugged, display details are missing. Assuming typical rugged phone construction, both will likely feature durable glass. The key difference will be processing power impacting UI smoothness. The Armor 24's Helio G96 will provide adequate visuals, but the WP210's Dimensity 8200 will deliver a noticeably more fluid experience, especially when scrolling or navigating complex interfaces.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, but given the market segment, we can infer both phones will feature multiple rear cameras. However, the processing power of the Dimensity 8200 in the WP210 will likely enable superior image processing, including better noise reduction, dynamic range, and potentially more advanced features like computational photography. The Armor 24 will likely offer acceptable image quality, but will struggle to match the WP210's capabilities in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The Oukitel WP210’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Ulefone Armor 24’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 8200 utilizes a tri-cluster configuration with Cortex-A78 cores, offering substantially higher peak performance and improved efficiency. The Armor 24’s Cortex-A76 cores are older and less efficient. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the WP210. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8200 also generates less heat, potentially mitigating thermal throttling during prolonged intensive use.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 24 boasts a significantly longer battery endurance of 166:39h compared to the Oukitel WP210’s 86:17h. This is a substantial difference, indicating the Armor 24 can last nearly twice as long on a single charge. However, the WP210 compensates with 45W wired charging, while the Armor 24 supports 66W. While 66W sounds faster, the WP210’s more efficient chipset means it will likely reach a usable charge level faster overall, despite the lower wattage. Both devices offer 10W reverse wired charging, useful for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 24 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, prioritizing longevity and reliability over raw speed. This is ideal for field workers, campers, or anyone frequently away from power outlets. Buy the Oukitel WP210 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, even if it means charging more frequently. This phone caters to power users and those who want a rugged device that doesn't compromise on performance.