Ulefone Armor 24 vs. Blackview BV9200: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum battery endurance and longevity, the Ulefone Armor 24 is the clear winner. Its exceptional 166:39h endurance rating surpasses the BV9200. However, the Blackview BV9200 counters with the convenience of 30W wireless charging, making it ideal for those who value charging flexibility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 24 | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 181.2 x 87 x 27.5 mm (7.13 x 3.43 x 1.08 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 647 g (1.43 lb) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~69.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 22000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Armor 24
- Exceptional 166:39h battery endurance
- 1000 charge cycle battery longevity
- 66W wired fast charging
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are lacking
Blackview BV9200
- Brighter display (481 nits)
- 30W wireless charging
- 66W wired fast charging
- Shorter battery endurance than Ulefone Armor 24
- Limited camera information
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 boasts a measurable 481 nits of peak brightness and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, suggesting superior outdoor visibility and image quality compared to the Ulefone Armor 24, for which display specs are not provided. While the Armor 24's display details are absent, the BV9200's contrast ratio indicates deeper blacks and a more vibrant picture. This makes the BV9200 a better choice for media consumption in bright sunlight. The lack of display information for the Ulefone Armor 24 is a notable omission.
Camera Comparison
Neither device's camera specifications are detailed enough to draw strong conclusions. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it's impossible to assess image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility. Focusing on the primary sensor details, if available, would be crucial for a meaningful camera comparison. The lack of information suggests neither phone is positioned as a photography powerhouse.
Performance
Both the Ulefone Armor 24 and Blackview BV9200 are powered by the Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration of 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means performance will be largely identical for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Thermal management will likely be similar, though the rugged designs of both phones may present unique cooling challenges. The absence of RAM and storage details for both devices makes a definitive performance comparison difficult, but the chipset is the primary determinant here.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 24 distinguishes itself with an impressive 166:39h endurance rating and a claimed 1000 charge cycles, indicating exceptional longevity and battery health retention. The Blackview BV9200, while offering 66W wired charging like the Armor 24, adds 30W wireless charging for added convenience. The Armor 24's endurance suggests significantly longer usage between charges, while the BV9200 prioritizes charging flexibility. The 66W wired charging on both devices should deliver reasonably fast top-ups, but the Armor 24's endurance is the standout feature.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 24 if you need unparalleled battery life for extended fieldwork, travel, or emergency preparedness, and aren't reliant on wireless charging. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize the convenience of wireless charging, appreciate a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and don't mind slightly shorter battery life between charges.