Ulefone Armor 17 Pro vs Power Armor 18T: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Power Armor 18T edges out the Armor 17 Pro thanks to its slightly more powerful Dimensity 900 chipset and faster charging. However, the Armor 17 Pro remains a strong contender, especially if you prioritize a more compact design and slightly better wireless charging speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro | Ulefone Power Armor 18T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 290 g (10.23 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| MagSafe compatible accessories | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 5380 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 640 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- More compact design
- Faster 66W wired charging (initial)
- 15W wireless charging
- Wireless reverse charging
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Potentially slightly lower camera quality
- No wireless reverse charging
Ulefone Power Armor 18T
- More powerful Dimensity 900 chipset
- Larger display (likely)
- 5W wireless reverse charging
- Potentially better camera processing
- Larger and heavier design
- Slightly slower wired charging (after initial burst)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, likely around 6.5-6.6 inches, with a resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Power Armor 18T likely has a slightly larger display, potentially offering a more immersive viewing experience. Expect both to have decent brightness and color accuracy for outdoor use, typical of rugged phones.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, potentially including a 48MP main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the Dimensity 900's image signal processor (ISP) in the 18T may offer slightly better processing and low-light performance. Expect decent, but not flagship-level, camera capabilities.
Performance
The Power Armor 18T's Dimensity 900 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Armor 17 Pro's Helio G99. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the 18T. Both phones will handle everyday tasks without issue, but the 18T is the clear winner for demanding users.
Battery Life
Both phones boast large batteries (likely 6000-7000mAh) and 66W wired charging. The Power Armor 18T charges slightly slower wired (52% in 30 min vs 53% in 15 min for the 17 Pro), but offers 5W wireless reverse charging, a feature absent on the 17 Pro. Battery life should be excellent on both devices, easily lasting a full day of heavy use.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is ideal for users who want a more pocketable rugged phone with good performance and fast-charging capabilities. The Ulefone Power Armor 18T is better suited for those who prioritize raw power, faster charging, and a larger display for media consumption, even if it means a larger device.