Ulefone Armor 17 Pro vs. Power Armor 13: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster chipset (Helio G99 vs G95), faster charging (66W vs 33W), and wireless reverse charging. While the Power Armor 13 boasts exceptional battery life, the 17 Pro's overall performance and charging speed make it the more compelling choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 290 g (10.23 oz) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| MagSafe compatible accessories | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5380 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Faster Chipset (Helio G99)
- 66W Wired Charging
- Wireless Reverse Charging
- Potentially Better Camera ISP
- Modern Design
- Shorter Battery Life than Power Armor 13
- Camera Quality Not Top-Tier
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Exceptional Battery Life (296h Endurance Rating)
- Rugged Design
- High Contrast Ratio Display
- Slower Chipset (Helio G95)
- 33W Wired Charging
- No Wireless Reverse Charging
- Potentially Lower Performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a high contrast ratio (1306:1), but the Armor 17 Pro likely has a slightly more modern panel with potentially better color accuracy and viewing angles. The Armor 17 Pro's display is reported to have a measured brightness of 401 nits, which is consistent across both devices. While both are usable outdoors, direct sunlight may still pose a challenge.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not fully detailed for either device. However, given the chipset differences, the Armor 17 Pro likely has a slightly more capable image signal processor (ISP), potentially resulting in better image quality, especially in low light. Both phones are expected to offer decent, but not exceptional, camera performance for their price range.
Performance
The Armor 17 Pro's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset (6nm) offers a substantial performance advantage over the Power Armor 13's Helio G95 (12nm). The G99's newer architecture and smaller manufacturing process translate to faster processing speeds, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. Expect noticeable lag in demanding apps on the Power Armor 13.
Battery Life
The Power Armor 13 shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 296 hours is exceptional, suggesting it can easily last for multiple days on a single charge. The Armor 17 Pro, while having a good battery capacity, won't match the Power Armor 13's longevity due to its more power-hungry chipset and faster charging.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance, faster charging, and modern features while still needing a rugged device. The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is best suited for those who absolutely prioritize maximum battery life above all else and are less concerned with raw processing power.