Ulefone Armor 17 Pro vs. Armor 7E: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster chipset, faster charging (wired and wireless), and likely improved camera capabilities. While the Armor 7E remains a durable option, the 17 Pro's advancements make it the superior choice for most users seeking a modern rugged phone.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro | Ulefone Armor 7E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2020, March 30. Released 2020, March 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) | 165.9 x 81 x 13.6 mm (6.53 x 3.19 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 290 g (10.23 oz) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~72.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | 5-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| MagSafe compatible accessories | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed | 15W wired 10W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5380 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Faster Processor (Helio G99)
- 66W Wired Charging
- 15W Wireless Charging
- Wireless Reverse Charging
- Likely Improved Camera
- Potentially Higher Price
- May be slightly bulkier
Ulefone Armor 7E
- More Affordable
- Durable Design
- Decent Battery Life
- Slower Processor (Helio P90)
- Slow Charging (15W Wired, 10W Wireless)
- Older Technology
- Likely Lower Camera Quality
Display Comparison
The Armor 17 Pro likely features a larger and higher-resolution display than the Armor 7E, offering a more immersive viewing experience. While both are likely to be durable, the 17 Pro's display technology is expected to be more advanced, potentially with better color accuracy and brightness. Specific display specs (resolution, size, panel type) would need to be confirmed for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer decent camera capabilities for their class, the Armor 17 Pro is expected to have a more advanced camera system. The G99 chipset often pairs with better image signal processors (ISPs), leading to improved image quality, especially in low light. Specific camera specs (megapixel count, aperture, features) would be needed for a precise comparison.
Performance
The Helio G99 in the Armor 17 Pro is a substantial upgrade over the Helio P90 in the Armor 7E. The G99's newer architecture and 6nm process offer significantly better performance and efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance on the 17 Pro.
Battery Life
Both phones offer substantial battery capacity, but the Armor 17 Pro's more efficient chipset should translate to better battery life overall. The 66W wired charging and 15W wireless charging on the 17 Pro are a significant advantage over the Armor 7E's 15W wired and 10W wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is ideal for users who need a powerful, feature-rich rugged phone with fast charging and a modern chipset. The Armor 7E is a good option for those on a tighter budget who prioritize basic durability and don't need the latest performance.