Ulefone Armor 17 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro edges out the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro thanks to its superior processor, smoother software experience, and better camera. While the Armor 17 Pro boasts faster charging and a larger battery, Samsung's overall refinement makes it the winner.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro | Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2022, June 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) | 168.8 x 79.9 x 9.9 mm (6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 290 g (10.23 oz) | 235 g (8.29 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~77.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, charging connector pins |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/mc/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| MagSafe compatible accessories | Samsung DeX support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed | 25W wired (USA) 15W wired (International) |
| Type | Li-Po 5380 mAh | Li-Po 4050 mAh, removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | SM-G736U, SM-G736U1, SM-G736B, SM-G736B/DS |
| Price | About 260 EUR | $ 155.92 / C$ 329.97 / £ 249.00 / € 199.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.48 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Exceptional durability
- Fast 66W wired charging
- Large battery capacity
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- More affordable
- Less powerful processor
- Basic display
- Potentially lower camera quality
- Less refined software
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G processor
- Smoother software experience (One UI)
- Better camera quality
- Durable design
- Samsung's ecosystem support
- Slower charging (25W)
- Smaller battery capacity
- Higher price point
- Less extreme durability than Armor 17 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature durable displays, but the XCover6 Pro likely has better color accuracy and brightness due to Samsung's display technology. The Armor 17 Pro's display is likely more basic, prioritizing durability over visual fidelity. Screen sizes are similar, around 6.3-6.6 inches.
Camera Comparison
The XCover6 Pro's camera system is expected to be superior, leveraging Samsung's image processing expertise. While the Armor 17 Pro likely has a high megapixel count, image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance will likely be better on the Samsung. Expect better video recording capabilities on the XCover6 Pro as well.
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G in the XCover6 Pro is significantly more powerful than the Helio G99 in the Armor 17 Pro. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Samsung. The Armor 17 Pro will handle everyday tasks adequately, but may struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
The Armor 17 Pro has a larger battery capacity (likely 7000mAh vs. XCover6 Pro's 4500mAh), but the XCover6 Pro's more efficient processor could result in comparable or even slightly better real-world battery life. The Armor 17 Pro's 66W wired charging is a significant advantage over the XCover6 Pro's 25W charging (in the US). Both offer wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing extreme durability, fast charging, and a larger battery at a budget-friendly price. The Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro is best for those who want a more polished experience, a better camera, and a more reliable software ecosystem, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.