Ulefone Armor 17 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro wins on durability and charging speed, boasting 66W wired charging and a rugged design. However, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G offers a more polished software experience and potentially better camera performance, though it lags significantly in charging. It's a trade-off between resilience and refinement.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2021, June 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2021, June 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) | 167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 290 g (10.23 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1152p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| MagSafe compatible accessories | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5380 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Gray, White, Mint, Violet |
| Models | - | SM-A226B, SM-A226B/DS, SM-A226B/DSN, SM-A226BR, SM-A226BR/N, SM-A226L, SC-56B |
| Price | About 260 EUR | £ 92.00 / € 125.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.73 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1631:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 242155 (v8), 223188 (v9) GeekBench: 6913 (v4.4), 1719 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Rugged and durable design
- 66W fast charging
- Wireless charging (including reverse wireless)
- Decent performance for the price
- Potentially lower display quality
- Camera may not be as good as the A22 5G
- Software experience may be less polished
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Excellent battery life (118h endurance rating)
- Reputable brand (Samsung)
- Likely better camera performance
- Smooth software experience
- Slow 15W charging
- Less durable than the Armor 17 Pro
- Older model
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G likely has a slightly better display experience overall. While both offer a 1631:1 contrast ratio, the A22 5G's 385 nits brightness is a significant advantage in outdoor visibility. The Armor 17 Pro's display is likely adequate, but not as vibrant or easily viewable in bright sunlight. Screen size and resolution are likely similar, but panel quality is the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is a tricky comparison. The Galaxy A22 5G generally has a reputation for better image processing and potentially more versatile camera setup. While the Armor 17 Pro likely has a decent camera, Samsung's software optimization often results in more pleasing photos. Expect better low-light performance from the A22 5G.
Performance
Both phones utilize an Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) CPU, but the chipset differences matter. The Mediatek Helio G99 in the Armor 17 Pro and the Dimensity 700 in the A22 5G offer comparable performance for everyday tasks. However, the 6nm process of the G99 *could* offer slightly better efficiency. Gaming performance will be decent on both, but don't expect flagship-level speeds.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro's battery capacity is likely comparable, but the slower 15W charging speed means it will take significantly longer to recharge. The Armor 17 Pro's 66W wired charging is a major advantage when you *do* need to top up quickly.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is ideal for outdoor enthusiasts, construction workers, or anyone needing a phone that can withstand harsh conditions. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a good choice for everyday users who prioritize a smooth user experience and a recognizable brand, but don't need extreme durability.