Ulefone Armor 17 Pro vs Cat S75: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro takes the lead with its significantly faster charging (66W wired, 15W wireless), more powerful chipset (Helio G99), and reverse wireless charging. While the Cat S75 boasts thermal imaging, the Armor 17 Pro offers a better overall performance and value proposition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 290 g (10.23 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| MagSafe compatible accessories | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed | 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5380 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 600 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Faster Charging (66W wired)
- More Powerful Chipset (Helio G99)
- Reverse Wireless Charging
- Likely Better Camera System
- Potentially Larger/Higher Resolution Display
- Durability might be slightly less than Cat S75 (subjective)
- Thermal Imaging absent
Cat S75
- Thermal Imaging Camera
- Rugged and Durable Design
- Wireless Charging
- Slower Charging (15W wireless)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 930)
- Potentially Lower Camera Quality
- Smaller/Lower Resolution Display (likely)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature durable displays, likely with Gorilla Glass protection, though specific versions aren't always detailed. The Armor 17 Pro likely has a slightly larger display and potentially a higher resolution, offering a more immersive viewing experience. The Cat S75 prioritizes durability over screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are often a weak point in rugged phones. While detailed specs are missing, the Armor 17 Pro likely has a more versatile camera system with potentially higher resolution sensors. The Cat S75's camera is likely adequate for basic photography, but not a standout feature. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Cat S75's Dimensity 930. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Armor 17 Pro. Both utilize octa-core processors, but the G99's Cortex-A76 cores offer a performance boost.
Battery Life
Both phones offer decent battery life, but the Armor 17 Pro's 66W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Cat S75's 15W wireless charging is slower. Battery capacity is likely similar, but the charging speed difference is significant.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and reverse wireless charging. The Cat S75 is best suited for those who absolutely need thermal imaging capabilities and are willing to compromise on speed and charging.