Ulefone Armor 12 5G vs. Armor 11 5G: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor 12 5G edges out the Armor 11 5G thanks to its slightly more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset and faster wireless charging. However, the Armor 11 5G remains a solid choice, especially if you find it at a better price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 12 5G | Ulefone Armor 11 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 14 | 2021, February 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 23 | Available. Released 2021, March 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 175.9 x 82.5 x 14.3 mm (6.93 x 3.25 x 0.56 in) | 163.8 x 81.6 x 14.2 mm (6.45 x 3.21 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 296 g (10.44 oz) | 295 g (10.41 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 104.4 cm2 (~71.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~68.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 125˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.78", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 15W wireless | 18W wired 10W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5180 mAh | Li-Po 5200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Orange, Gray/Black | Black |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 480 EUR |
Ulefone Armor 12 5G
- More powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
- Faster 15W wireless charging
- Potentially improved software optimization
- Rugged and durable design
- Potentially higher price
- Similar camera performance to Armor 11 5G
Ulefone Armor 11 5G
- Lower price (potentially)
- Rugged and durable design
- Decent 5G connectivity
- All-day battery life
- Slightly slower performance
- Slower 10W wireless charging
- Average camera performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar ruggedized displays, likely around 6.3-inch size with a 720+ resolution. Expect good outdoor visibility but don't anticipate flagship-level sharpness. The Armor 12 5G *might* have slightly improved color accuracy due to potential software optimizations, but this is difficult to confirm without testing.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with a main 48MP sensor and potentially a depth sensor. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Expect decent results in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be average. The Armor 12 5G *may* benefit from newer image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Armor 12 5G's Dimensity 700 offers a noticeable performance boost over the Armor 11 5G's Dimensity 800. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks and 5G connectivity, the Dimensity 700 provides smoother multitasking and slightly better gaming performance. The Cortex-A76 core count difference also contributes to this.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life. The Armor 12 5G's 15W wireless charging is a significant advantage over the Armor 11 5G's 10W wireless charging, offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor 12 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance and faster wireless charging in a rugged package. The Armor 11 5G is a great option for those seeking a reliable, durable 5G phone at a potentially lower cost, and who don't heavily rely on wireless charging.