Ulefone Armor 12 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Rugged Choice or Mainstream Champion?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the overall winner, offering a superior display, camera, and software experience. However, the Ulefone Armor 12 5G is a compelling choice for those needing exceptional durability and a rugged design, sacrificing some polish for resilience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor 12 5G | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 14 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 23 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 175.9 x 82.5 x 14.3 mm (6.93 x 3.25 x 0.56 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 296 g (10.44 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 104.4 cm2 (~71.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 15W wireless | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5180 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Orange, Gray/Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 370 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Armor 12 5G
- Rugged and durable design
- Water and dust resistant
- Wireless charging
- 5G connectivity
- Lower display quality
- Less powerful processor
- Potentially lower camera quality
- Slower wired charging
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- More powerful processor
- Superior camera system
- Faster wired charging
- Refined software experience
- Less durable design
- No wireless charging (potentially)
- More fragile than Armor 12 5G
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (800 nits) with a near-infinite contrast ratio, offering vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Ulefone Armor 12 5G's display is likely less bright and may have lower contrast, impacting outdoor usability. The A52s also likely has a higher resolution.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is expected to have a superior camera system, offering better image quality, dynamic range, and video recording capabilities. The Ulefone Armor 12 5G's camera is likely adequate but won't match the A52s' performance. Samsung's image processing is also generally considered superior.
Performance
While both phones feature octa-core processors, the Snapdragon 778G 5G in the Galaxy A52s 5G generally outperforms the Dimensity 700 in the Ulefone Armor 12 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A52s. The A52s' CPU architecture is also more efficient.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the Galaxy A52s 5G achieving an endurance rating of 113h. The Ulefone Armor 12 5G's battery capacity is likely comparable, but the A52s' more efficient processor may contribute to slightly better real-world performance. Both support wired charging, but the A52s has faster 25W charging compared to the Armor 12 5G's 18W. The Armor 12 5G also offers wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor 12 5G if you work in demanding environments, need a phone that can withstand drops and water, or simply prefer a rugged design. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you want a well-rounded phone with a great display, camera, and software, and don't require extreme durability.