The Toshiba G900 and HTC Touch Pro were flagship Windows Mobile devices battling for supremacy in the mid-2000s. Both offered stylus-based interaction and a suite of productivity features, but which one truly delivered a better experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to find out.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The HTC Touch Pro edges out the Toshiba G900 thanks to its superior hardware, particularly its slide-out QWERTY keyboard and slightly more powerful processor. While the G900 had a beautiful screen, the Touch Pro's overall functionality and performance make it the winner.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 3.6/0.384 Mbps | HSPA 7.2/0.384 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - HTC Fuze |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2007, February | 2008, June. Released 2008, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 119 x 61 x 21.5 mm (4.69 x 2.40 x 0.85 in) | 102 x 51 x 18.1 mm (4.02 x 2.01 x 0.71 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | QWERTY |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~311 ppi density) | 480 x 640 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~286 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.0 inches, 25.6 cm2 (~35.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~46.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors |
| | - | TouchFLO 3D finger swipe navigation
Touch-sensitive navigation controls
Handwriting recognition |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Marvell PXA270 520 MHz | 528 MHz ARM 11 |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm MSM7201A |
| GPU | - | Adreno 130 |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6 Professional | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | miniSD | microSD (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 40MB 128MB RAM | 288MB RAM, 512MB ROM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 2 MP | 3.15 MP, AF |
| Video | 320p | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | VGA videocall camera | VGA videocall camera |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3, WAV, WMA ringtones |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| | 2.5 mm audio jack | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0, A2DP | 2.0, A2DP |
| Positioning | No | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | No | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | miniUSB 1.1, OTG | miniUSB |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11b/g, VoIP over WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (Opera 8.6) | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted) | Accelerometer |
| | Pocket Office
MP3/ACC+ player
Photo editor
Voice memo
Organizer | TV-out
Pocket Office
Voice memo
MP3 player |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 320 h | Up to 406 h |
| Talk time | Up to 4 h 20 min | Up to 8 h |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1320 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 1340 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver | Black |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.50 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) | 1.43 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -85.3dB / Crosstalk -86.3dB |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 74dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 73dB
|
Toshiba G900
- Large, high-resolution display
- Premium design and build quality
- Excellent outdoor screen visibility (transflective)
- Sleek and stylish
- Shorter battery life
- Less powerful processor
- No physical keyboard
- Windows Mobile limitations
HTC Touch Pro
- Slide-out QWERTY keyboard
- Slightly better performance
- More robust feature set
- Better connectivity options (e.g., GPS)
- More common software support (due to HTC's broader presence)
- Smaller screen
- Less vibrant display (AMOLED)
- Design less premium than G900
- Windows Mobile limitations
Display Comparison
The Toshiba G900 boasted a stunning 4.1-inch transflective LCD screen with a resolution of 800x480 pixels – significantly larger and sharper than the HTC Touch Pro's 2.8-inch display. While the transflective technology was excellent for outdoor visibility, it lacked the vibrant colors of the Touch Pro's AMOLED screen. The G900's screen was a major selling point.
Camera Comparison
Both devices featured 3.2-megapixel cameras, but image quality was generally mediocre by today's standards. The HTC Touch Pro's camera often produced slightly more vibrant colors, while the G900's tended to be a bit more muted. Neither camera was a standout feature.
Performance
The HTC Touch Pro held a slight advantage in performance. Its Qualcomm MSM7201A chipset with a 528 MHz ARM 11 processor offered a bit more horsepower than the Toshiba G900's Marvell PXA270 520 MHz CPU. This translated to slightly smoother multitasking and faster application loading times on the Touch Pro, though both devices were limited by Windows Mobile's inherent performance bottlenecks.
Battery Life
Battery life was a mixed bag. The Toshiba G900, with its larger screen, generally offered slightly shorter battery life than the HTC Touch Pro. Both devices required daily charging with moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Toshiba G900 is ideal for users prioritizing a large, high-resolution display and a premium design. The HTC Touch Pro is better suited for those needing a physical keyboard for efficient typing and a more robust feature set, including better connectivity options.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which device is better for typing?
The HTC Touch Pro is significantly better for typing due to its slide-out QWERTY keyboard. The Toshiba G900 relies solely on an on-screen keyboard.
❓ Which phone has the better screen?
The Toshiba G900 has a larger and higher-resolution screen, making it better for viewing content. However, the HTC Touch Pro's AMOLED display offers more vibrant colors.
