The Tecno Spark Go 2 and itel A70 represent the fiercely competitive entry-level smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly affordable price point. However, key differences in their underlying hardware, particularly the chipset, dictate their performance capabilities and suitability for different users. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Tecno Spark Go 2 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Unisoc T7250 chipset, featuring Cortex-A75 performance cores, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the itel A70’s Unisoc T603. While the itel A70 is more affordable, the performance gains of the Tecno justify the slight price increase for those prioritizing responsiveness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 24 | 2023, October 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2023, November |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 77 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 8.6 mm thickness |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~263 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 (12 nm) | Unisoc T603 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | - |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF | 13 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ink Black, Titanium Grey, Veil White, Turquoise Green | Brilliant Gold, Stylish Black, Field Green, Azure Blue |
| Models | KM4 | A665L |
| Price | About 80 EUR | - |
Tecno Spark Go 2
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- Faster 15W charging
- Potentially better low-light camera performance
- Likely slightly higher price
- May not have significantly better battery life despite faster charging
itel A70
- More affordable price point
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Likely similar battery life for light usage
- Slower processor leading to lag with demanding apps
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially limited software support
Display Comparison
Neither Tecno nor itel provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, given the price bracket, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The real differentiator lies in performance, not display quality. Expect similar viewing angles and color reproduction on both. Bezels are likely comparable, prioritizing cost reduction over premium aesthetics. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO is standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable. However, given the market segment, both devices likely feature basic camera setups focused on affordability. Expect a primary sensor on both, potentially accompanied by a secondary depth or macro sensor (often of limited utility). Image processing will be basic, prioritizing speed over advanced features. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is expected. The image quality will likely be similar in good lighting conditions, but the Tecno Spark Go 2’s slightly more powerful chipset *could* offer faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance, though this is speculative without detailed camera specs.
Performance
The core difference between these two devices is the chipset. The Tecno Spark Go 2’s Unisoc T7250 (12nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration: octa-core with 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the itel A70’s Unisoc T603, which features an octa-core configuration but lacks the higher-performance Cortex-A75 cores. The A75 cores in the T7250 translate to significantly faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets are adequate for basic tasks, the T7250 will handle more demanding apps and light gaming with greater ease. The 12nm process node of the T7250 is also slightly more efficient than the T603’s, potentially leading to marginally better battery life under load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, both likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this price point. The key difference is charging speed: the Tecno Spark Go 2 supports 15W wired charging, while the itel A70 is limited to 10W. This means the Tecno will charge significantly faster, reducing downtime. While a larger battery capacity is always desirable, the faster charging of the Tecno Spark Go 2 mitigates the impact of a potentially slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark Go 2 if you need a smartphone capable of handling everyday tasks with a degree of smoothness, and occasionally running slightly more demanding apps. It’s ideal for users who value a responsive experience and don’t want to compromise on performance within this budget. Buy the itel A70 if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize absolute affordability above all else. It’s a solid choice for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Spark Go 2 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Tecno Spark Go 2 can *run* PUBG Mobile, expect to play at the lowest graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops during intense moments. The Unisoc T7250 isn't a gaming powerhouse, but it's significantly better suited for gaming than the Unisoc T603 in the itel A70.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Tecno Spark Go 2 compared to the itel A70?
The Tecno Spark Go 2’s 15W charging is considerably faster than the itel A70’s 10W charging. While exact 0-100% times aren't available, you can expect the Tecno to charge approximately 30-40% faster, reducing downtime and getting you back to using your phone sooner.
❓ Are both phones likely to receive regular software updates?
Software update support is often limited on phones in this price range. While both Tecno and itel provide updates, they are typically infrequent and focused on security patches rather than major Android version upgrades. Expect the Tecno Spark Go 2 to potentially receive slightly more consistent updates due to Tecno's larger market presence.
