The Tecno Spark 6 and Oppo A53s 5G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver value, they take different approaches: the Spark 6 prioritizes a balance of features and affordability, while the A53s 5G focuses on bringing 5G connectivity to a wider audience. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster data speeds, the Oppo A53s 5G is the better choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, offers a noticeable performance uplift and 5G support. However, the Tecno Spark 6 remains a viable option for those less concerned with 5G and seeking a slightly faster CPU core clock speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 25. Released 2020, September 25 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, May 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 170.8 x 77.3 x 9.2 mm (6.72 x 3.04 x 0.36 in) | 164 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 7.0 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Comet Black, Dynamic Orabge, Misty Violet | Crystal Blue, Ink Black |
| Models | KE7 | CPH2321 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Tecno Spark 6
- Faster wired charging (18W)
- Potentially slightly higher CPU clock speed
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Less efficient chipset (12nm)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Older processor architecture
Oppo A53s 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More efficient chipset (7nm)
- Modern processor architecture
- Slower wired charging (10W)
- Potentially lower CPU clock speed
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely utilize LCD panels. The A53s 5G, being a newer device, *may* benefit from slightly improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are likely capped at 60Hz. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses. The A53s 5G, being a newer model, *may* benefit from improved image processing algorithms. The Helio G70 in the Spark 6 has a capable ISP, but the Dimensity 700’s ISP is more advanced, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. It's reasonable to assume both phones include a 2MP macro lens, which offers limited practical benefit due to its low resolution.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A53s 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) is a significant upgrade over the Tecno Spark 6’s Helio G70 (12nm). The 7nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance during demanding tasks. While the Spark 6 boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 vs 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 on the A53s 5G), the architectural improvements in the A76 cores and the integrated 5G modem of the Dimensity 700 provide a more substantial real-world performance advantage. The A53s 5G will excel in tasks leveraging 5G connectivity and graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but the charging wattage reveals a key difference. The Tecno Spark 6’s 18W charging is significantly faster than the Oppo A53s 5G’s 10W charging. This means the Spark 6 will achieve a full charge in a shorter timeframe. However, the Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency could offset the slower charging speed, potentially resulting in comparable real-world battery life despite a potentially smaller battery capacity on the A53s 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 6 if you need a phone with a slightly more powerful CPU for everyday tasks and don't require 5G connectivity. It's ideal for users who primarily use their phone for social media, calls, and light browsing. Buy the Oppo A53s 5G if you prioritize 5G access for faster download and streaming speeds, and value a more modern, efficient chipset that will likely offer better long-term performance and potentially better software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A53s 5G's 5G connectivity actually make a difference in my daily use?
The benefit of 5G depends heavily on your location and carrier coverage. If you live in an area with robust 5G infrastructure, you'll experience significantly faster download and streaming speeds. However, if 5G coverage is limited, the difference may be negligible. The Dimensity 700 also supports sub-6GHz 5G, which is more widely deployed than mmWave.
❓ Is the Helio G70 in the Tecno Spark 6 powerful enough for playing demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G70 can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The chipset may struggle with sustained performance during extended gaming sessions due to thermal throttling. The Oppo A53s 5G, with its more efficient Dimensity 700, will offer a better gaming experience overall.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Tecno Spark 6 compared to the Oppo A53s 5G?
With 18W charging versus 10W, the Tecno Spark 6 will charge approximately 80% faster than the Oppo A53s 5G, assuming both phones support the advertised charging speeds. This translates to a significantly reduced time to reach a full charge, which is a convenience many users will appreciate.
