Both the Tecno Spark 5 and Infinix Smart 4c occupy the ultra-budget smartphone segment, targeting first-time smartphone users or those needing a reliable secondary device. While both utilize the Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, a critical difference in CPU core count dictates real-world performance, making this a surprisingly important comparison for users prioritizing responsiveness.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Tecno Spark 5 emerges as the better choice. Its octa-core CPU, despite sharing the same Helio A22 foundation as the Infinix Smart 4c’s quad-core processor, provides a noticeably smoother multitasking experience and improved app loading times, justifying a potential slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 04. Released 2020, May 26 | 2019, November. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.3 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 167 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.57 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Jadeite, Spark Orange, Vacation Blue, Misty Grey | Midnight Black, Quetzal Cyan, Cosmic Purple |
| Models | KE5, KD7S | X653C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | - |
Tecno Spark 5
- Octa-core CPU offers superior multitasking
- Potentially smoother app experience
- Better suited for light gaming
- May be slightly more expensive
- Likely similar camera performance to the Smart 4c
Infinix Smart 4c
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Sufficient for essential communication tasks
- Quad-core CPU struggles with multitasking
- Slower app loading times
- Less responsive user interface
Display Comparison
Neither Tecno nor Infinix provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. Given their market positioning, both likely feature 720p+ LCD panels. Expect similar color accuracy and brightness levels, with neither device likely to excel in outdoor visibility. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, reflecting their budget nature. The absence of higher refresh rates or advanced panel technologies like LTPO is standard for this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. Both devices likely feature a primary camera alongside auxiliary sensors (potentially depth or macro). Given the price point, image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions but will struggle in low light. Expect limited dynamic range and detail. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is almost certain on both. Focusing on megapixel counts alone is misleading; sensor size and image processing algorithms are more critical, and these details are unavailable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPU configuration. The Tecno Spark 5 boasts an octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, while the Infinix Smart 4c is equipped with a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. While both are based on the same architecture and clock speed, the doubled core count of the Spark 5 translates to significantly improved multitasking capabilities. The Spark 5 will handle app switching and running multiple applications concurrently with less lag. The Helio A22 chipset's integrated GPU is identical in both devices, meaning gaming performance will be broadly similar, limited by the GPU's capabilities. RAM configurations, not specified here, will also play a role, but the CPU difference is the primary differentiator.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not provided. However, given the Helio A22’s efficiency and the target market, both devices likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. Charging speeds are expected to be slow, likely utilizing Micro-USB connectivity. The lower processing demands of the Infinix Smart 4c might result in slightly longer battery life in some scenarios, but the difference will likely be marginal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 5 if you need a phone capable of handling more than just basic tasks like calls and messaging. The extra CPU cores will benefit users who occasionally browse social media, use multiple apps simultaneously, or play light games. Buy the Infinix Smart 4c if your primary needs are limited to essential communication and you prioritize absolute affordability, accepting a trade-off in overall system responsiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will I notice a difference in app loading times between the Tecno Spark 5 and Infinix Smart 4c?
Yes, you will likely notice a significant difference. The Tecno Spark 5’s octa-core CPU will load apps faster and handle more complex applications more smoothly than the Infinix Smart 4c’s quad-core processor. This is especially noticeable when switching between apps.
❓ Is the difference in CPU cores worth the potential extra cost of the Tecno Spark 5?
If you plan to use your smartphone for anything beyond basic calls and messaging, the extra CPU cores in the Tecno Spark 5 are worth the investment. The improved multitasking and responsiveness will enhance your overall user experience. However, if your needs are minimal, the Infinix Smart 4c remains a viable option.
❓ Can either of these phones handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
Both phones can *run* PUBG Mobile, but not at high settings. The Helio A22’s GPU is entry-level, so you’ll need to play at the lowest graphics settings and potentially reduce the frame rate to achieve playable performance. Expect lag and stuttering, especially during intense firefights.
